Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dampfschiff
1 year ago

If the money is enough for the new car, the new car. The used car is hardly cheaper here than it corresponds to the average long-term loss of value for this driving performance (70.000 km in 2 years). A used bargain is something else.

Muster1
1 year ago

If I had the financial resources and a driver’s license for it, then definitely the new car. I don’t think there’s 4000€ anymore. Of course, it’s not a little, but at least you have the security that you don’t sit on damage.

Mariomadda69
1 year ago

Actually, I would say the new car, even if I personally never bought new cars…now used cars are quite expensive,of which it is to be considered whether the new car can also be delivered directly or whether there is up to 1 year waiting time…

XxlumosxX
1 year ago

If he doesn’t have much idea or can’t take anyone who knows well and takes the car under the magnifying glass, then I would still invest the remaining 4.000,00 € and rebuild it.

Schnarchnix
1 year ago

I would buy the used, but at the kilometer level and age not for € 15,000. I’d pay a maximum of four digits.

€15,000 are offshore and close to the Wucher.

jbinfo
1 year ago

If the GW is identical to the NW, the GW is clearly too expensive. So buy new cars with a long manufacturer warranty. Like Toyota = 10 years, Hyundai = 5 years, Kia = 7 years

Jack98765
1 year ago

In that case, I’d grab a new car. The two-year-old doesn’t cost less than the new one, but it’s already down 70,000.

DerPeter001
1 year ago

I think you better buy the new car.

LittleMac1976
1 year ago

I’d always tend to be a new car, you know what you have.

In a used car, you never know how it was previously “treated”.

wiki01
1 year ago

A 2 year old car that has 70,000km on the clock and costs a new 19,000€ is certainly not worth 15,000€.

Ernsthaft69
1 year ago

I would take the new car because at used it is always often tricked