Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
24 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Uneternal
7 months ago

In view of the fact that the camera is at times well below 400€ new to buy, the price is not really a bargain.

You have similar cameras with the Panasonic LX-3 and LX-7. How many compact cameras do you need?

Pialesb29
7 months ago

I have this camera as a handy 3 camera

A good device but no I would not buy it again today

She’s got a couple of parts.

Autofocus is relatively slow

The serial image mode is slow

In the photo Mudos, only AF-S does not exist an AF-C (the latter is important for objects moving zb animals).

Films only Maximum in Full Hd

Edit:

Achja in indoor spaces you almost have to use the flash otherwise it will be very difficult to get pictures

Pialesb29
7 months ago
Reply to  christl10

I’m very happy with my mother borrowing the camera from me often and getting along well with it (I’d also give her my big alphas but they’re too heavy with small lenses)

FlorianH246
7 months ago

The price is good, but neither I nor you need such a camera.

schelm1
7 months ago

Just on the edge:

Don’t you already have all the possible cameras you’re asking to be more bad than right?

On the other hand, you can enjoy € 145 for four cheap car tires of your newlyweds.

Her “Fetisch” reminds me of my wife’s shoe and boot collection, even though it makes clear what further purchases do not exclude.

schelm1
7 months ago
Reply to  christl10

Knausern instead of acting generously – already clear!

I don’t know if there’s any more refreshed like a student’s time, which will burst during the ride?

Uneternal
7 months ago
Reply to  schelm1

In USA we would say you read it. 😅

schelm1
7 months ago

Well, he was the indication of the intended use of the proud amount by the niece.

Just give the kid something.

Rolajamo
7 months ago

No. If I carry an extra camera then a “right”.

And for everything else, I have my phone.

I don’t spend any money on such a holiday paradise.

Rolajamo
7 months ago
Reply to  christl10

One with their results I can do something. In my case, the Sony A7 IV. But don’t have to be so expensive, the last was an FUJI XT3. It is also much more handy.

Pialesb29
7 months ago
Reply to  Rolajamo

The Rx 100 3 is not designed as a holiday amateur knipse, which is a compact camera with strong lens and relatively large sensor

Not everywhere you can drag a huge dog sword Sony full format with pure

Rolajamo
7 months ago
Reply to  Pialesb29

That’s different. And you have already listed reasons that do not convince me of your opinion.

Maybe she was good, but now it’s a compact camera with ageing technology that can’t keep with sharpness, noise and light.

Rolajamo
7 months ago

And yet, with me, she has a right to take an Alpha 7 III or IV or a 6700 into a concert without a press accreditation, which is already taken away from you during scanning

Yeah, well, with the reason I can understand the acquisition 😀

But otherwise I don’t share your opinion. What’s not bad. If you have an area of application, it’ll fit.

Pialesb29
7 months ago

And yet, with me, she has a right to take an Alpha 7 III or IV or a 6700 into a concert without a press accreditation, which is already taken away from you during scanning

And it usually makes even better photos than my Samsung A54

Surely she doesn’t replace a current Sony system camera but she was never thought of as a hobby holiday Knipse by the way, for that too the zoom too little on the thing

SirKermit
7 months ago

Small vicious note on the edge: the emphasis should be on “a” lie. 😉

Rolajamo
7 months ago

This is because the target group is not an amateur holiday club, but people who know how to use and use a camera. And none of them will use a built-in flash.