Würdet ihr den Kontakt zu eurer Schwester ganz abbrechen?
Wenn sie auf eure Tochter 2 Jahre aufpasst, sich aber mit Musik und Handy ablenkt und nicht mitbekommt, dass eure Tochter eine 1 Cent Münze verschluckt hat und dort seit paar Minuten liegt und sie dadurch gestorben ist
If my child dies, only because my sister has violated her duty of supervision, I could never forgive her. I wouldn’t want to see her anymore.
Of course everyone dies. But this is not a reason to put the life of another person – especially a child – at stake for self-passion!
Unrealistic scenario. Children who have a bit aspered (so have got an item in the lungs) will have at least breathing noise, coughs, skirts etc. It also always depends on the size of the item, but with a 1 cent coin that enters one of the lungs, there is still enough lung to breathe. It is also not large enough to close the airway further up.
Of course there’s something you should get into the emergency room, but you don’t die so fast on a 1 cent coin.
I guess the FS is more about the principle.
Even then are things that happen to parents. You can’t watch children 24h. This goes so fast that a child has swallowed something or has pulled a pot with hot water from the herd and brewed.
How good or bad you can arrange further contact with the sister with his mourning if the child actually dies, everyone must know. But in the ZNA you can see so many children swallowed up with things, put things in the ear/ nose, incubated, poisoning – because a funny cleaning agent tastes.
Something happens – and it can happen to everyone. Even if this is so negatively formulated by FS, FS rejects himself with “Handy & Music”. Can’t just happen if you go to the bathroom, cook by the way, or, or…
All in all, the example is very unrealistic, so I’m going to formulate a more general situation.
Let us take to the sister would have blamed the dead of the two-year-old by negligent behavior or by inattentiveness himself. Then they must be punished by their appropriate guilt feelings and probably by legal consequences.
Even if this is difficult for all to process and also hard to forgive, I would not break the contact. Even if the relationship with each other is no longer as before.
I personally wouldn’t do it, but my wife is there, for example, something different has 3 siblings and there is often slender and then they always break off contact for some time. Now it is also the case again, a sister has locked her to WhatsApp. I always think it’s totally stupid that something like that must be about little things
The little daughter would smile and scream awfully, that would never ignore your sister.
Therefore, answer is superfluous.
You don’t have to cancel the contact…
… but don’t give her the care.
“… but don’t transfer the care to her.”
Since the child is dead in the case, it’s done by itself.
Wouldn’t be wise to care for a dead child.
Oh, I read that. Now it’s not always that there can be no other child.
Again
Since when children have been striving to swallow a 1 cent coin.
Is summer hole again?
That wouldn’t have anything to do with “shortly not paying attention.”
I probably wouldn’t have entrusted the child to her at all.
Everyone must die at some point, it doesn’t matter how where or when.