Wo kann ich das melden?
Mein Lehrer in Sozialkunde hat uns letzte Woche gefragt, ob wir bereits einen festen Ausbildungsplatz in der Tasche haben. Ich meldete mich und sagte, dass ich bei der Bundespolizei im mD für den 01.09.2025 einen Platz habe und später zur Bundesbereitschaftspolizei möchte.
Er reagierte abwertend und sagte ,,also zum rechten Schlägertrupp?“.
Ich möchte dies morgen unbedingt dem Direktor melden, da ich es empörend finde, wie feindlich sich mein Lehrer gegenüber der Polizei äußert. Gibt es noch andere Anlaufstellen?
Denn die Polizei vertritt die freiheitlich demokratischen Grundsätze unseres Landes!
(4 votes)
Loading...
The school line or the upper school office. If you have fellow students as witnesses, it’s even better.
How times change.
When I told a teacher 45 years ago that I denied war service, vocabularies like “Drückeberger”, “Vaterlandsloser Schweinhund” and “left gesocks” came.
I could imagine that the director will laugh at you. Because the teacher asked only one question, not his political attitude.
In addition, everyone has the right to free development.
And, if necessary, also the right to free expression.
Policemen are also inflated that they are there for the citizen and protect him. Pronounced policemen often to legitimize their job.
But the truth looks different. Police officers are executive bodies of legislation, i.e. politicians (of course on behalf of the people).
Police officers only do what politicians do with their laws. And that is not always in the sense of the citizen. (Denk to the Corona protection measures).
You should be aware of that as a police officer in spe.
You have the right, however, if you have anything to do with your inner conviction to quit the police service at any time.
I think it would be most useful when you or your parents first speak with the teacher under four eyes and make it clear how declining and injuring his remark was to you, as you want to be the team.
Perhaps the teacher, for example at a demo, has had bad experiences with the Bepo, and at the moment it was not clear how it works on you. If he sees it and apologises to you, it might already be done.
If that doesn’t mean anything, the next escalation stage would be because in this case it is not about a teacher’s decision, but about his behaviour, a supervisor at school.
If you/you then believe that your concern has not been sufficiently resolved, the next higher office i.D.R. would be the competent school office of your school district or federal state. This can vary according to country.
Here is an article about the procedure:
https://www.kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.de/kita.
You will also find that this is not necessarily the case.
Let me explain why your teacher said that. I also grew up with the saying “The police, your friend and helper!” – And I had to revise my view.
Yes, then do it.
I wanted to know if there were other points of contact.
The school line is the starting point.
Don’t forget to report to yourself.
You speak of freedom of democratic principles and at the same time you refuse them to the teacher…. Or should a teacher not have his own opinion and political orientation? (Ob which has lost something in class is another topic!)
So what exactly do you want to agree with freedom or democratic if you are unable to respect other opinions? You don’t have to take it, you don’t have to find it right, but you don’t have the right to forbid others.
Then you’ll find it also outrageous how you feel about your teacher? If not, your complete text doesn’t make any sense.
The decisive difference is that a teacher has a role model and, as part of his professional role, is obliged to preserve neutrality, especially in political issues. My criticism is not directed against the opinion of my teacher, but against the fact that he expresses this opinion in teaching where it has not lost anything. If he shares his personal opinion outside school, that is his good right, but in teaching he has the duty to remain differentiated and neutral. So my statement does not aim to ban his opinion, but rather to the inappropriate platform he uses for it. That’s a big difference you don’t seem to understand.
The point is, if you insist that democratic principles are respected, then you must accept them yourself and keep them from your side!
Democracy is not a one-way road!
You should think about that. Then all the discussions are reluctant. And that’s exactly what I made quite clear with the text!
This question is about this “other topic”. The “meaning” of this teacher is completely marginal – he must have, but not express in teaching!
And it remains to the pupil an inconsistency to degrade his professional planning in this way!
Your argument goes past the core of the thing. Freedom-democratic principles do not mean that everyone can say everything he wants at any time and in any place, regardless of its responsibility or context. Democracy is not a one-way street that is true, but it also comes with rules and duties, especially for people in public or educational roles.
A teacher has the task of staying neutral and not exerting a political influence on pupils. If he leaves this role, I can criticize it, it has nothing to do with taking his freedom of expression, but with the legitimate demand that he perceives his professional responsibility. The discussion is therefore not necessary, but is important, precisely because democracy also means to criticise where rules are being violated.
Allow the police to report