Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
20 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SouthStick
8 months ago

Yes, your PC will definitely be faster if you use a dedicated graphics card (dGPU) instead of the integrated graphics unit (iGPU). Here’s why this is:

  1. Performance: A dedicated graphics card like the RTX 2070 Super is much more powerful than the integrated graphics solution of the i5-8400. It offers more computing power, better graphics support and can better deal with higher requirements.
  2. Memory: The dedicated GPU has its own graphics memory (VRAM), which is specially designed for graphics tasks. In contrast, the integrated graphics use the system RAM, which is usually slower and can impair performance.
  3. Multitasking: With a dedicated graphics card, the CPU and the System RAM are relieved because the GPU takes over the entire graphics processing. This can improve the overall performance of your PC, especially in graphics-intensive applications and games.
  4. Functions: Dedicated GPUs often offer additional features such as higher resolutions, faster image repetition rates and support for modern graphics technologies that may not be possible with integrated graphics.

In short, if you install a dedicated graphics card like the RTX 2070 Super, you will usually see a significant improvement in performance, especially in demanding tasks and games.

gfntom
8 months ago
Reply to  SouthStick

Once again, one who gives up ChatGPT and Co’s responses…

Donnerdrache
8 months ago

It depends on which GPU. But if she’s a bit new and it’s not Office GPU. Then yes.

Donnerdrache
8 months ago
Reply to  NickS747

A GT 710 would be, for example, an Office GPU. Whether it would be faster than your IGPU depends on which IGPU you have and which Office GPU you are building.

Khalil4800
8 months ago

Yes, your PC will usually be faster, especially in graphics-intensive applications and games, if you install a dedicated GPU (dGPU) instead of an integrated GPU (iGPU).

sgt119
8 months ago

Depends on the application and which iGPU/dGPU it is

Technomanking
8 months ago

Hello,

Depending on the application, the system can already benefit from a dedicated graphics card.

LG

Raptor2799
8 months ago

Yes, much faster.

Except you have 8700g and build a 😅

MagicBoss812
8 months ago

Yes, exactly

MagicBoss812
8 months ago
Reply to  NickS747

This can be found quickly by Google Search “GTX 730 vs Radeon [Art and Type]”

KTM2110
8 months ago
Reply to  MagicBoss812

You can’t say that. There are enough dGPUS that are slower than some IGPU.

MagicBoss812
8 months ago
Reply to  KTM2110

Yes, the new ones from the Letzen year, which are also probably not intended for gaming. Do you think a comparison between an old grandpa and a boy (exaggerated)? Because I know what comparisons you will call me now

KTM2110
8 months ago

Of course he did. You said no one would buy the 1650. I proved the opposite.

Except for all the people, they stole their copy, in that case I’m wrong…

MagicBoss812
8 months ago

I think I meant the 1630. Besides, the link has no real connection to this one.

KTM2110
8 months ago

That the user can change an upgrade from iGPU to iGPU only by CPU (if he only hops from iGPU to iGPU).

What is this supposed to have to do with anything previous or the question?

KTM2110
8 months ago

No one buys the 1650?

https://store.steamed.com/hwsurvey/Steam Hardware Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam

You can’t make the price difference as an argument at all, because the IGPU just accidentally stick to an entire CPU. After the logic, you should also add a CPU to the dGPU.

Furthermore, I should like to mention conditions when my statement applies?

“Yes, exactly”

I really don’t see them with you…

So where is this

There are enough dGPUS that are slower than some IGPU.

A false statement?

MagicBoss812
8 months ago

Well, typical example, with a map that no one buys at the end but draws a comparison. I’m talking about the same year of construction, I’m talking about some if you know them. The majority of better iGPUs will probably not exist. There are plenty of eGPU from different years of construction than the iGPU, which are naturally slower. Again to the example with Opa vs child (exaggerated).

If you now see that iGPU is better than a GPU, tja, please refer to the following conditions of acceptance. That the user can and must upgrade from iGPU to iGPU only by CPU (where: he also only hops from iGPU to iGPU). In addition, the price difference for your example is quite large: min. 120€ vs min. EUR 260 (sources: https://www.amazon.de/ASUS graphics card architecture displayPort-PH-GTX1630-4G-EVO/dp/B0BQJMTB1L?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&psc=1&smid=A3JKAKR8XB7XF

https://www.amazon.de/AMD-Ryzen-7-8700F-Box/dp/B0D2JCMP34?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&psc=1&smid=A3JWKAKR8XB7XF&language=en_EN

The majority here also speaks for it, so why should we start a discussion at once or try an unprecedented fact with a false statement

There are enough dGPUS are slower than some IGPU.

to relocate?

KTM2110
8 months ago

No, not necessarily.

Compare a Radeon 780M and a GTX1630. The 1630 is not so old and the 780M makes the absolutely flat. Even with a 1650 it can keep.