Sollte das nicht einfacher sein, als autonomes Auto, weil man ja an Schiene gebunden ist?
(3 votes)
Loading...Hallo, ich möchte wissen, welche öffentl. Verkehrsmitteln Ihr wirklich gernebenutzt, wenn Ihr die freie Wahl dazu hättet?
Der Lint ist ein Dieseltriebwagen, der bundesweit fährt. Es gibt den Lint 27, Lint 41, Lint 54 und Lint 81. Es sind die Baureihen 620, 622, 623, 627, 648 und 1648. Wie gefällt euch der Coradia Lint?
Meine Freundin würde beim Schwarzfahren erwischt, sie hat kein gültiges busticket. Der Kontrolleur hat sie dann aufgeschrieben mit dem Vermerk sie hätte ihr Ticket vergessen. Allerdings hat sie gelogen. Es wäre ein Azubi Bus Ticket gewesen. Ein gemeinsamer Freund von uns hat eine Monatskarte für diesen Monat, kann sie die dann nachzeigen oder fliegt das…
Ja meine Frage lautet, ob die Westfalenbahn ein nahverkehrszug ist!
Jede Antwort ist hilfreich reich
The strike has nothing to do with it, especially since
Today and tomorrow
NOT the DB trains drive
Local transport (the Öffis) mainly in larger cities. So Strabs buses and subways
And the problem is not the autonomous train.
There are autonomous routes like subways.
the route network
The open track doesn’t care about hares. But the wind of a suicide can only be seen by man not any scanner.
He doesn’t see if the soft is wrong because Indusi fails.
AND AND AND AND that would not have prevented disasters. Eschede just had to pull a passenger’s emergency brake when the wheel tire came up, and he doesn’t press through the ground at 300km/h in a millisecond. If it were, then only the train would probably not even be derailed, the wheel tire is only the support you can change if the overall wheel diameter becomes too small. Without it, that was a cursed crowd. Because the whole wheel would have to be changed. A new wheel tire is shrunk, which has about 2 mm. It’s not a problem. But he wasn’t through and triggered the disaster. On the train itself, probably 1 million “monitoring scanners” would have to be attached for this (it just doesn’t fall into a ).
We mean we need to allow a completely new track network in the super-ground tunnel with roads over/underpass around each barrier to become pointless.
The GDL has once again opened negotiations, and in the coming weeks it threatens permanent strikes.
The train has enough money to keep it in the length. Just 1 million Superspar tickets came out 9,90€, Only the missing 10€ to the standard Supersparticket 19,90 must come anywhere. For €19.90, you are under the QDL (a day ticket valid €46) even two.
As a GDL, I’d be tough with Titan.
Once you look around in other countries that are not “eclogized” by greens, you will notice: there are environmentally friendly solutions and lanes without a locomotive guide.
And there the highways are empty because railway is faster and cheaper.
And no planes flying in their own country because the train travels more frequently than the bus and is faster than an airplane.
For this, we have pink spotted rainworms under nature protection, even if they have never seen anyone
I’m sure it’ll come sometime.
Interestingly, there was something similar. In the past, as the chairs were still operated by designated experts and who have been struggling, they have received more wages at the first time, but at the second strike, employers have simply refurbished and made a young person unemployed.
This is of course not comparable but interesting
There’s a lot of it. At least on individual short distances. Or trams, U lanes etc.
And in the long term (annual) it will certainly happen. Not because of the strikes. It is because technical development makes people simply superfluous as a train driver. In particular in passenger transport, where there are fixed plans and procedures.
In freight transport and generally to arrange/couple or for maintenance trains etc, there will probably be even longer people at the wheel of the locomotive, as there are more variable ones to which a person can react better.
Will there be sooner or later. But not because of the strikes, but because you can optimize train traffic so clearly. However, this lacks the necessary infrastructure.
There have been a long time, for example in the Nuremberg subway, at Düsseldorf airport and much more.
And yes, in the not too distant future, you should not need a locomotive driver in “normal trains” who is in there.
This will always be a wish for.
No computer can refuel a diesel locomotive, no computer can eliminate a disturbance on the train. There are thousands of things on the train that only one person can. Often there are switches and signal disturbances, and then a locomotive driver AUF BEFEHL may also pass a red signal. All things a computer cannot and should not do.
In addition, the employment effect is overestimated, in which locomotive may not be a person, but then you need a thousand people in the data center udn as a service technician.
Oh, my God, it’s certainly the smallest problem with refueling.
The time when a locomotive driver went into the machine room with the wrench is over. They also only call the hotline and press a few buttons on the display. It’s good to get out of the distance. And whether a Fdl dictates a command remotely or digitally to a computer does not matter. The latter probably go faster. Appropriate interfaces on the control units are naturally provided.
What actually plays a role are external influences, people in the track etc. And, solutions are also found for this.
It will take decades, but the locomotive will die one day.
In contrast to the car, the train cannot avoid a milimeter and has a braking path up to one kilometre … and more.
There will certainly be. Not necessarily because of strikes, but because of technical progress.