Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DorktorNoth
11 months ago

In fact, I also find the system somewhat absurd, but a certain twisted logic is in it – one looks at the absolutely unfair current situation.

Mother and child are a unit in it. Mother and child are registered at the registry office. The father, now yes. There are two ways: if the mother is married, the husband automatically applies as a father. Point. Further information is not required. If, in advance, no one has objected to this, it is extremely difficult to change this even if the husband is not the biological producer.

If the mother is not married, there are several possibilities. Either she admits not to know the father. Or she’s giving a man as a father. He can then acknowledge fatherhood (either before or after birth) and then gives as a father – also here again: Whoever is a father is it, even if later doubts arise about it, which can even be proved. It is important that the mother has no duty to give a man as a father.

According to my knowledge, a man (except he is married to the mother, which automatically makes him a father) can also do little to become a father without the consent of the mother. She can give the father who is asked. Whether it is otherwise possible, so that a man goes off and says he is the father of the child and that must then also be entered, is not so easy. It goes, but in doubt it has to do with judgment etc.

You can speculate about the reasons. I suppose it’s about protection. Thus, no man, e.g. after a relationship with domestic violence or at worst rape, from which a child emerges, cannot easily come to the address of mother and child. On the other hand, the mother naturally allows her unloved men who would not be harmful to the development of the child to keep their neck off – which can be a shame for the child. As always, the legislature goes from a largely cure world – if both parents wanted the child, why shouldn’t you tell the others? But that’s it. All that is well meant (e.g. for protection) can be abused somehow. In any case, this is in my opinion the reason why the mothers come with in the note at the post office and the fathers only come about the paternity recognition after the father was appointed by the mother or the marriage certificate.

This part that you’re a husband automatically a father, by the way, I find quite obsolete. But good – if everyone agrees this can also be clarified before birth. Just as stupid is that children can be protected from dangerous fathers – but not from dangerous mothers. Because even if there may be more rare, there are also. I don’t know if the system comes into reform with the increasing disappearance of the classic family.

Kabeltante1266
11 months ago

Because it’s clear she’s the mother. Anyone who is the father is either known and is then also specified, or he is not known, but may be determined by a paternity test.

wilees
11 months ago

Because the name of the child’s father in children born out of marriage is only after the paternity has been recognized in the birth certificate.

In the case of married children – i.e. when the woman is married – the husband is always registered as a father of a child.

wilees
11 months ago
Reply to  tim22100

In the case of children born out of marriage, it also remains, except for the mother, that the child receives the surname of the father (with his consent).

Kitharea
11 months ago

Because the mother is always uniquely identifiable. The mother “need” but also enter the name of the father into the birth certificate. It’s just not proveable. The mother, on the other hand.

Kitharea
11 months ago
Reply to  tim22100

And paternity tests without the consent of the party are strictly forbidden… you have no plan what I meant – but rumor.

Kitharea
11 months ago
Reply to  tim22100

The baby is born in a hospital where it usually brings a doctor or a midwife to the world. Child and mother are officially documented there. Color of the skin, interests, gender, door colour interested no S****

Kitharea
11 months ago

This has nothing to do with custody. And that you know that has nothing to do with what the law recognizes.

Kitharea
11 months ago

You can identify if you are identified by law. This has nothing to do with the skin colour, the name, hairstyle or the favourite food.
What is documented at birth is subject to certain regulations that ensure that from the moment of birth also the mother is documented. Blow. Do I speak against a wall?

Cubacita
11 months ago

Mother wears child.