Why are the symptoms treated but the cause not sought?

I believe it is because doctors in their studies do not learn anything about the relationship between cause and effect. 2 examples from my own history of illness:

1. Heuschnupfen: The symptom treatment “hyposensibilisation” had paid the health insurance, but it had not cured me from the allergy. Of course not because the cause continued. (This doctor knew nothing about the causes.) I had learned the cause from a book by another doctor who had retrained himself in natural medicine and nutritional medicine, and also applied alternative methods that developed themselves. With his method, I largely got rid of the hay fever.
2. Neurodermitis: The skin doctor told me, “This is not curable, but you can treat it well.” That wasn’t true either. I also got rid of the skin problems with the same or g. causal method.

The ordinary doctors simply don’t know about the causes of diseases, or they think relationships with the patient’s life are insane. In addition, the vast majority of patients want to know nothing about such relationships. And if you were to tell them, they would change the doctor because they don’t want to change their way of life. You want to continue as before, only the symptoms should be gone. (I’ve learned from psychotherapists that they’re doing this with their patients.) In this respect, one could say that the doctors are trained to meet the desire of most patients. The few patients who want something else need to look for their healing path away from school medicine and pay a lot of money for it. This is how our health system works.