Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
elch77
2 years ago

The obligation had been “exposed” before.

It was very controversial from the outset and would probably be rejected by the European Court as unconstitutional as there is no scientific evidence for it.

The resistance in Austria was amazingly high. In Austria there is hardly anything going on the road or even strung. This was different. The Federal Government (and also the opposition) had completely misjudged this. These parties were now afraid (and are) that the vaccination opponents are going over to the FPÖ or to the newly established MFG (proven opponents of vaccination).

Therefore, the law has now been carefully tilted and calls for “no trenches between vaccinated and inoculated”.

The ÖVP and the Greens have made the right time, the SPÖ has done it again. But with such an incapable party leader as Pamela Rendi-Wagner is, it was no wonder.

In any case, the topic “vaccination duty” should be definitively off the table. However, the government will try to continue the division in the population on detours, e.g. over major limitations of the inoculated.

Sky150119
2 years ago

The demand was probably not so big and their health ministers find that voluntaryness is better than duty.

MitFrage
2 years ago

It seems that you don’t need them right now.

MitFrage
2 years ago
Reply to  udtojan95617

I want to do what is medically useful. Why does the vaccination theme have such a close connection to the government? It’s about medicine, not politics.

josua1942
2 years ago

Some politicians tremble for their re-election.