Wieso essen so viele selbsternannte „Vegetarier“ eigentlich noch Fisch, wenn sie schon kein Fleisch essen? Ist doch auch ein Tier oder? Wieso essen die dann dieses bestimmte Tier und alle anderen Tiere nicht? Was soll das? Dann sollen sie sich Pescetarier nennen. Aber die Frage hier bleibt, wieso man bei Fisch ne Ausnahme macht. Also.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Hallo, ich habe ein 125 Liter Aquarium und würde gerne Kampffische halten. Könnt ihr mir sagen, wie viele von welchem Geschlecht in der Aquariumsgröße halten kann?
Habt ihr Erfahrungen mit aptamil pre pronutra? Oder welche pre Nahrung benutzt ihr und könnt ihr empfehlen ?
Hallihallo ich habe eine Frage hat jemand erfahrung gemacht mit einem kräftigen mänchen und sein biss? tut das doll weh?
Hello everyone, could you bake a cake with Nutella?
Sollte ich wieder versuchen runter auf 58kg zu kommen? Oder ist das dünn genug? Ist das überhaupt Dünn? Als frau
Meine ma hat mir erzählt das eine Nacktschnecke einen Regenwurm gefressen hätte! Ihr sei es aufgefallen weil sie gerade den Balkon gefegt hat und da ist ihr aufgefallen das die Nacktschnecke einen Regenwurm unter ihrem Bauch hätte! Jetzt hab ich ne Frage! Ist ne Nacktschnecke ein Allesfresser oder nur Pflanzenfresser! Hab zwar gegoogelt aber nix…
Because they just want to follow a trend to get out of the crowd somehow
If you don’t get anything else, you’ll get self-proclaimed vegetarians and try to get some attention.
Greetings DayX19
It comes from Catholicism. In the Middle Ages, the Church has forbidden people to eat meat on more than half of the days of the year. However, fish was allowed. Fish was all that could swim, so beavers, ducks and geese. In catholic areas, some people mean that if you don’t eat meat you can still eat fish.
Rationally, of course, it doesn’t make sense. It’s just like animal muscle. Fish also feel exactly as pain, overfishing destroys the ecosystems of the oceans, aquacultures pollute the environment, and exposure to mercury, microplastics, dioxin, antibiotics and what you find in fish is not exactly healthy.
This comes from the fasts in the Christian faith. There you have explained everything that aquatic animals are not to be eaten.
These originally include not only fish, but also water wings such as ducks, geese or swans.
There was once the claim that fish had no pain feeling. Maybe that’s the reason. But it is certain that it is simply inconsistent.
These aren’t real, a real one forgoes any kind of meat.I’ve had something to do with vegetarians and came to a cooking class for Vegeratria with chickens.
https://www.netdoktor.de/ernaehrung/pescetarier-kein-fleisch-aberfisch/
It is quite obvious that fish are regarded as less valuable/living than other animals. Whatever.
It’s the same for pet keeping. It is sad reality that over a species-friendly fish keeping is very noticeably much more often not thought out than about an art-friendly attitude of dogs, cats, gekkos horses, mice, agams, chameleons or any other animals with legs. Many do not even come up with the idea that a herring is not closer to a cat than a horse with a dog.
Where this completely different approach comes, I’m completely incomprehensible.
Vegetarians do not eat meat for ethical reasons.
This is probably related to the idea why someone is not giving up meat. Animal welfare is not the only reason
And flesh?
Can they?
It’s just the fruitier. 😀
That would be here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pescetarism
Why is hard to say actually.
In moral aspects, I am also irritated.
In health, it is a bit better to understand.
Because fish are not mammals and therefore emotionally considered by people less than “relative”.
You mean biological, not emotional. Your arguments are completely confused
No, I mean emotional, emotional. People react emotionally to cute animals. Didn’t you understand my answer?
will you not answer my previous question or why the topic is constantly changing?
So these are the “responses” that are always mentioned… so, then thank you for the realization.
And google “Kindchenschema”:
Do you read what you write? You only wrote because fish are not mammals and then because animals are cute. What does one have to do with the other? You’re in contradictions all the time
Because it’s just self-proclaimed and no law prescribes anything to you.
because one is able to multiply in windeseile… so for example, a fish-two sets a million eggs
the same could be done with frightening or other insects. I think that most vegetarians have nothing against it — but they have not yet come to taste
p.s. because of overfishing, it is not good for the environment to sprinkle wild fish…
Exactly and these one million eggs usually survive around the 100? Not great. And rumored pigs would not die, so bad argument
Of the millions of eggs that a pair of fish lays, in the normal case, exactly 2 are mature and lay eggs. If it were more, the stocks would explode.
The same thing could be done with rabbits. They also multiply very quickly.
Then it’s worse than thought. Then the argument with the many descendants is even worse
because they use the wrong term: Vegetal = vegetable, animal products were never plantable.
They should call themselves “selective animal products” because, that’s exactly what they are.
Why is it important to you what someone calls you?
And how many are the “many” fishese who call themselves vegetarians?
Are you always answering questions?
Because vegetarians have found a grey zone through our human-made definitions.
It’s “fish”, not “meat”.
They don’t know it themselves.
Any restricted diet is not appropriate.
Man is an omnivore.
Neither lion nor beef.
Vegetarians don’t eat fish.
And why there are pescetariers.
I don’t know.
A fish is very intelligent and feels just like we and any other animal pain.
You don’t have to understand
Right: Already existing minors are not necessarily better due to long-term “deficit diet”.
WUSSTEN WIRS DOCH:
Are Vegis smarter?
As scientists from the British University of Southampton found out, the higher the IQ in childhood, the greater the probability of being an adult vegetarian. A difference in IQ of 15 percent increases the likelihood of being vegetarians by 38 percent.
I’m proud that there are still some Neandertal genes in my inheritance.
According to scientific knowledge, this leads to quality improvement.
In areas where mixing with Neandertal genes is absent, this positive effect is completely lacking.
Yes, if you don’t understand pure logic, you don’t have a high IQ.
and this is a Neanderthal, Ugg ugg, grumpf grumpf, do you understand that better?
Who commissioned and paid this study?
By the way, such a thing should be a duty in any “study”, the truthfulness.