Wieso denken Leute die vegan oder vegetarisch sie könnten die Welt ändern?
Es wird trotzdem Fleisch produziert und Tiere geschlachtet da juckt es niemanden das sie keins essen
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Kopfverletzung?
ByHhhdkk
Hallo Leute. Heute war ich mit meinen Bruder draußen und er hat aus irgendeinem Grund einen Großen Stein hoch geworfen und der ist dann oben gegen meinen Kopf geknallt. Auch wenn es kein übertrieben heftiger Schlag war mach ich mir Sorgen. Ich hab gehört man kann wegen sowas hirnblutungen bekommen. Was soll ich machen? Der…
Kennt ihr Döner-Rollos?
Byshellaai
Hallöchen, wir wollen morgen Essen bei einem anderen Imbiss bestellen als üblicherweise. Dieser hat „Rollos“ auf der Speisekarte, diese sind immer mit Tomatensauce und Käse gefüllt. Dann hat man verschiedene Inhalte zur Auswahl, z. B. Dönerfleisch, Krautsalat und Zwiebeln. Mir sagt solch ein Rollo nichts, was kann ich mir darunter vorstellen? Ähnlich wie ein Lahmacun?…
Was tun bei Verbrennung?
heyy, habe mir heute vor 2h heißes Teewasser gemacht, hab die Kanne gehoben, bin gestolpert und das heiße Wasser ist auf meinen Fuß gelandet. Jetzt sind rote Flecken auf meinen rechten Fuß. Hatte zum Glück ne Socke an hab die auch gleich ausgezogen aber jetzt brennt mein Fuß nach zwei stunden immer noch höllisch. Habe…
Ausversehen einen Esslöffel Zahnpasta gegessen bzw verschluckt was jetzt?
Was kann passieren??
Cocktailsoße und Joghurtsoße beim Döner?
Hallo, ich wollte fragen wieviel Kalorien die beiden Dönersaucen einzeln haben und welche die gesündere ist?
This is always a very personal decision, which is also made for very different reasons. And if someone doesn’t want animals to die for his food, that’s all right.
I doubt whether you are making great changes now. But it’s at least a beginning. In this way, positive developments can also be initiated.
Well, that’s the demand. If fewer meats eat, of course, fewer animals are slaughtered. The fact is, of course, that then we are also bred and that they do not live at all.
I think this is a personal decision. I’m just doing this missioning on the cookies, no matter who side.
So to draw attention to violence is mission?
? Going to others because they feed themselves differently than yourself, that’s missionary, and that’s what’s on my cookie. Just as wrong is it to encourage vegetarians or vegans to live. Violence, even verbal, is also not non-violent.
It seems to me that you are not able to read mene Postings sensually. Too bad, but not to change.
Freedom stops where the freedom of the other is limited. You wouldn’t call it a mission if someone beats his dog and other people attack him.
You know, this can be compared with elections, for example: If someone no longer chooses Party X, it will have no influence. If 100 people no longer choose them, neither. But if half does not choose it, it has a problem. And if they no longer choose 80% of the former voters, it will become quite insignificant. If no one ever chooses her, she’ll disappear.
What I want to say is that if half of the population suddenly becomes vegetarian, the meat industry will go down production, fewer animals would be slaughtered. One person does almost nothing, but can be the beginning for many more who follow.
Supply and demand if you’ve heard of it before.
These are such statements that people are meaningless but neither we vegans or vegetarians have ever said so. That’s a moral attitude. If one decides to leave the animals alone, give them a voice, so it is quite sensible to operate activism on the streets.
We’ll never give up until there’s no mass murder on animals.
Vegetarians & vegans like to put this claim in their mouth, but I have met another vegetarian or vegan who claimed it.
In Germany, 1.3% of vegan & over 8% live vegetarian. So almost 10% of the population & that definitely makes a difference. Ask a company what it would mean for them if 10% of the customers dropped.
If everyone would think that way, the world would change
I don’t think so.
Who claims that vegetarians or Vegan thinking? They simply decided that they do not want to use animals or animal products. What bothers you?
Now calm down. It is of course good for the animals that many also do not eat meat.
Yes, but in the future it may be less produced. Man can try.
Because they can. 😉
Even decades of traditional family farms now also produce meatless alternatives, tending increasing.
Who says they want to change the world? You have the attitude that no animal should die because of them. There’s nothing to do with that.
It’s someone who doesn’t eat meat. Less demand = less production. Logisch, right?
Yes – and I also think it makes many people extreme fear (so that is probably just “existent fear” – because many lobbyists live from the suffering of the animals)…
Very naive. Living without killing animals is not possible.
That’s not the point. It’s about the individual animal.
It doesn’t matter what animals it is. Every animal that is not killed for consumption is an animal that can live on.
No, just for farm animals and vegans did not abandon plants from farming for which animals die, but only animal products that always come from farm animals.
The questioner is not about a distinction in which category animals are classified, but about all animals.
General animals include wildlife, which means no animals are general.
That’s my speech. You started using the farm animals.
And there are ALL animals. Animals and wild. Wild are also animals.
Cows and pigs are farm animals, the deer for the deer roast is not. But this is not the question. It generally refers to animals.
But not all animals are farm animals so it is not about all animals as first claimed but only about farm animals.
The harebread is evil, but the field bun may be miserable on the field to consume plants.
Animals are also animals.
Production always depends on demand.
So it is not about animals as claimed first (that because of them no animal should die) but only for farm animals. So specialism.
Not ‘no animal’. Every animal that is not to be eaten can live on. It is only with delay because the meat must be offered before it is noticed that demand has fallen.
I think no animal dies. So quasi-religion
In view of your polemical “question” I would like to summarize: