Wie viele Kilometer schafft ein Mitsubishi Space Star als Neuwagen wenn man ihn fast nur auf der Autobahn fährt?
Hallo,
ich Wohne in Essen und Arbeite in Velbert und wollte mir deswegen ein Kleines Auto als Neuwagen mit 72 PS (Mitsubishi Space Star ) Kaufen was nicht viel an Ausstattung hat und recht Billig ist um nur von A nach B zu kommen, der Weg hin und zurück beträgt 50km und umfasst zu 90 Prozent Autobahnfahrt. Jetzt wollte ich einfach nur wissen wir das bei moderneren Neuwagen so mit der Motor Haltbarkeit aussieht wenn man sie immer Scheckheftgepflegt hält, immer rechtzeitig in die Werkstatt zur Inspektion bringt und Kurzfahrtstrecken vermeidet. Ich habe in einigen Artikeln gelesen das Kleinwagen meisten nur so um die 150.000 Km an Laufleistung schaffen, kann ich auch mehr schaffen wenn ich die Oben genannten Dinge immer ausführe?
Vielen Dank.
(2 votes)
Loading...
Technically speaking, in normal driving and regular service, it probably keeps up relatively long and could create more than 200,000 kilometers – especially Mitsubishi has always installed long-lasting engines, as there were never problems.
However, the question is whether the body does this: The SpaceStar is a cheap, cheaply developed and cheaply produced small car that is not designed for longevity and durability, but as a disposable product that you buy new, used a few years and then disposed of. The processing quality is bad, i.e. after some time it will be hoked in a jammed box that drones, beats, polishes and knees. It’s just not a pleasant ride. I know the problem of an 2009 Toyota Aygo, which has reached 120,000 kilometers so far, but is forcibly forgotten. It wasn’t good as a new car, it’s just a cheap car, only the technology is tough.
I would very much consider the undertaking and not buy a small car at the long distance, but at least something from the polo class or a compact – even a used, ten years old golf or Astra etc. is significantly better and feels subjectively much more fresh and high-quality than this Mitsubishi, who brings warranty and new cars as the only argument. However, this is also stupid when you have to get out of such a small car and after 50 kilometers, you have been wheeled because of the thin seats and the loud motor.
What do you think of this? Suzuki SWIFT 1.2 CLUB HYBRID KLIMA DAB BLUETOOTH as sedan in Essen (mobile.de) I think it’s a better choice.
The Suzuki SWIFT is simply a much more adult car with a much better level of safety in the event of a crash and therefore in any case prefer when the budget is available. Driving a car with a Mitsubishi Space Star also requires significantly more suffering.
That was not the question, however, that was about the service life. There is no reason to take that the engine of a Suzuki will last longer. It is also produced in India at Maruti.
But no doubt!
The Swift is a whole class larger with all the advantages, but still favorable. You can definitely call it a realistic choice and solid small cars!
Mitsubishi Space Star is produced in India under enormous cost pressure.
Nevertheless, there is no reason to assume that its motor could not achieve a high running performance under such favorable conditions as described by you. I’ll wear the engine 300,000 Km. Because: many potentially life-saving measures or fault-prone components are simply not present at all in these engines:
https://useswagenberater.de/mitsubishi-space-star- Diseases-deficit buying advice/
“Simpler, reliable engine: The 3A9 series
The selection of motors is limited to exactly two variants: The 1-liter three-cylinder engine carries the name 3A90 and produces 71 hp. The larger 3A92 1.2-litre engine delivers 80 hp to the second facelift in September 2020, then 71 hp. Since then, the Space Star has only been delivered with this unit.
Both variants were kept very simple, but still use modern technology to keep pace with the competition in terms of emissions and consumption. Instead of a toothed belt, Chain set, which, with regular maintenance even years of city traffic, can be easily removed.
In addition, it is a now very mature engine series, which has already been used in various models before the Space Star and has since been continuously developed.”
Most likely, at very high running performances, the control chain wears so much that it must be exchanged. Although this is an over 1000 Euro expensive repair, if at the same time all clamping rollers, pinions and plastic guide rails are exchanged (to exchange the control chain is total nonsense), it is necessary to consider that one does not have to exchange the toothed belt again and again at much shorter intervals, which would have cost just as much or more in the end.
By the way, the engine doesn’t care if the car was used for checkbooking. The engine only needs good engine oil on time plus oil filter, new spark plugs and air filters. That’s it. I therefore left my cars outside the warranty period NIE checkbook care. What for? I have always voted with my KFZ screwdriver what has to be done, e.g. drive shafts, tires.
I don’t need a KFZ teacher in the 2nd year of apprenticeship in a brand workshop that illuminates with the flashlight under my car, where at the end of the master puts his signature under it and breaks down SEINEN hourly rate. Not with me!
For safety-relevant parts, I have carried out the DEKRA which does the main test and does not allow me to pass if the hand brake is unequal, the shock absorbers are over or the brake discs are too severely worn. I don’t pay twice for the same performance, saves me a lot of money.
Again for the location: the engine of my Opel Corsa C, which was also produced under high cost pressure, kept 225,000 Km without any problems with a lot of full-gas autobahn, without any signs of weakness. The fact that I had to leave the car was simply because the engine was no longer oiltight and I would not have gotten a TÜV anymore, repair would have been too expensive.
Thank you for your detailed answer!
There are no long-term experiences with the R3 engines.
However, if you drive long distance, drive in the middle speed range with complete maintenance and good warmth and drive cold then there can be many.
However, I assume that the R3 engines do not reach the running performance of the R4 engines at that time. All components are weaker. Weight reduction, missing displacement, cylinder less. Euro 6 , High AGR Rate .
I’m going out about 150tkm. What’s wrong with it is your pleasure.
Mainly, you don’t rock the box with a short distance. Unfortunately, R3 engines have already been completely down at 40-60tm.
Does it make more sense to get the Suzuki Swift (also new cars) with 4 cylinders and 83 hp even if it costs a little more?
That makes sense. The Suzuki SWIFT is simply a much more adult car with a much better level of safety in the event of a crash and therefore in any case prefer when the budget is available. Driving a car with a Mitsubishi Space Star will definitely require much more suffering, due to sudden suspension, exotic tyre size in a push-buckle format and the tiny trunk.
With the Suzuki Swift you can go to the first run for two with luggage or transport a bicycle if you turn your front and rear wheel out. If you change the back bank, it’ll be fine. In addition, the Swift enjoys its lousy go-kart driving behavior.
Total bullshit! The engine has long been in use in previous Mitsubishi models and a reliable motor: The 3A9 series
https://useswagenberater.de/mitsubishi-space-star- Diseases-deficit buying advice/
“Obendrein is a now very mature engine series, which has already been used in various models before the Space Star and has since been continuously developed.”
I’m joining Christoph. If you stick to the maintenance plan, your car will last a long time.
If it is cold, drive gently warm (please not “is the engine cold give it six and a half”) But you should do that with every car. On the highway I would also drive it appropriately to the vehicle class, 120/130 km/h. At 50km per track you don’t have to drive faster, the minute you’re faster is not worth it.
Otherwise, if you treat him pleasing, he will last a long time. 150,000? Small trolleys that are nailed down with short distance etc. do not last so long, but that is then not on the car.
150,000? Double this.
Hey wadi ✨🙂!
If you take into account your above-mentioned maintenance, and also the proper warming, I am almost sure that a very, very high mileage performance is possible – regardless of the vehicle.
I go from at least(!) 250,000km, actually much more.
Greetings, Christoph 🖖
…NACHTRAG: Of course, you should also set up at speeds before the middle speed range and avoid permanent continuous gas under full load.
That sounds good, thanks for the quick answer 😉
No thing, very fond of ðŸTM‚
na you stretch with a row of 3 cylinders but far out of the window.
mmmh yes 😂!
However, I consider less cylinder better than many, with the same displacement. Because the higher the liter capacity.
But clearly, a real motor for long distance is different, since I am with you ðŸTM‚
Objection Your Honor: I have kicked my Corsa C 1.0 58 HP mercilessly on the highway, steep mountain down to 185 km/h in the red area. He still has up to 225,000 without symptoms of weakness. The car only had to leave because of the notorious Opel disease, oil impermeability.
Objection granted 🕵️ ♂️
High liter capacity is more a fact for higher wear. It’s always been like that and it won’t change.
hahaha