Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TCRhammerhai
1 year ago

Hey, I always write a red thread and rework it. In the course of history, more ideas I try to integrate them.

Can of course completely improvise, but you should have a rough plan of perpetrators, motive, crime scene, etc.

Lg

tinalisatina
1 year ago

A criminal has a lot to do with logic. If the action is not true or illogical, the whole story is garbage. Therefore, no one criminal is indispensable for a structured plot. It must be fixed from the start that is the process, otherwise you can’t generate any voltage.

To do this, you should research well how the police really work. At least when it comes to the book. A lot of what you know from books and films does not correspond to reality.

akl1969
1 year ago

This depends on your type of writing. I rarely plan and still manage to deliver my perpetrator to the knife. But what you always need is an idea of the perpetrator, an idea of the suspects and how it has come to the action. So far you should plan.

Bellbellbell
1 year ago

I would say that depends among other things on the necessary knowledge and how much you still lack. Research the topics that are to be found in the Crimea so that it is also authentic and realistic.

If you have the knowledge base, I would plan in advance what the rough action should be. So a rough layout from the beginning, middle and end.

Theoretically you can start 🙂

Glueckwunsch49
1 year ago
Reply to  Bellbellbell

That’s exactly what I wanted to write. 👍🏼

Ambermain2
1 year ago

You should plan in advance what should happen when, with Krimis, you have to plan something more here than with other stories because you always worry about the details that will bring the protagonist (e.g. an investigator) closer to the perpetrator or lure him on false ferries, as said, the smallest details are of great importance.