Wie viel Sauerstoff verbrennt eine Atom-Bomben-Explosion?
Wie viel Sauerstoff wird ca. bei einer 10-Kilotonnen verbrannt?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
(No Ratings Yet)Loading...
(No Ratings Yet)Loading...Similar Posts
Reaktionsgleichung beim Rauchen?
ByItsRaphi
Für ein Chemiereaktion bräuchte ich ein Beispiel einer Reaktionsgleichung, welche beim Rauchen abläuft, im Internet finde ich leider nichts. Kann wer helfen?
Warum reagiert Flussäure mit Glas und Salzsäure nicht?
Also generell reagiert Salzsäure ja schneller mit Verbindungen bzw Elementen mit denen es reagieren kann und Flussäure langsamer weil es weniger stark dissoziiert. Flussäure reagiert aber mit ein paar Verbindungen mit denen Salzsäure nicht reagiert. Ist es also so dass Flussäure mit allen Sachen mit denen Salzsäure reagiert und noch ein paar mehr auch reagiert…
Hat die Schicht, die sich nach anschneiden eines Apfels bildet eine schützende Funktion?
Byleena131
Hallo Community, die Schicht, die sich nach anschneiden und Entfernung der Apfelschale bildet, schützt sie evtl. ähnlich vor Vitaminverlust wie eine Schale? Bzw. bewirkt sie eine längere Haltbarkeit? Danke für Eure Antworten.
Passiert bei einer Hydrolyse eine Säure-Base-Reaktion?
Saccharose wird durch Wasser zu Glucose und Fruktose gespalten.
Chemie-alpha,beta,gamma zerfall?
Bynygen
Hallo Leute wisst ihr welches teilchen beim alpha gamma und beta zerfall emittiert wird (Chemie LK)
Reaktionsenthalpie berechnen?
ByLiacrazy
In einem Kalorimeter wird Natriumhydroxid in 200ml Wasser gelöst. Die Temperatur steigt um 13 K. Die molare Reaktionsenthalpie beträgt -44,5 kj/mol. Berechne die zugefügte Masse an Natriumhydroxid. Wie berechne ich die Masse ohne gegebene Stoffmenge? Kann mir da vielleicht jemand weiterhelfen? Liebe Grüße und vielen Dank im Voraus :))
Answer
Actually, no oxygen is needed for the explosion of an atomic bomb.
Although “burning” of oxygen can occur, it does not have to, e.g. in vacuum, an atomic bomb can rise, but there is no oxygen aka because we “burn” your oxygen.
However, if you ignite the atomic bomb into a forest or similar, you can already say goodbye to the oxygen in the forest… (probably you can also say goodbye to the forest)
Declaration
In the explosion of an atomic bomb, no chemical reactions such as the combustion of oxygen are denied. It is a purely physical process in which various core reactions (such as the fission and/or fusion) take place, but no chemical reactions or even oxygen are necessary for these reactions.
I could bet that an A-explosion under water is much smaller than on the surface or in space, the product will not behave as much as on earth.
If I burn and burn a match, then oxygen will be burned.
Just because something isn’t included, it doesn’t mean that something else isn’t involved.
We’ve got something like that. 21% oxygen in the world, in every place and fire needs oxygen to be there and grow…
Correct. Under water, the explosion would be significantly weaker than on the earth’s surface, based on which the air pressure on the earth’s surface is smaller than the water pressure under water, both of which have an effect on the explosion.
Jap. However, no oxygen is necessary. This is also made clear by the invoice, since the oxygen is already included in it.
Nope… About 1000 atoms in the universe are 900 hydrogen atoms, which makes up 90% of all atoms alone. Pure logic excludes this.
The indication would only apply to the Earth’s atmosphere in certain regions.
Yes, fire needs oxygen (or another oxidant) to grow. A fire is maintained by chemical reactions.
In an atomic explosion, however, no chemical reactions are involved, but only physical
However, an “atom explosion” is not a fireball, but particles which release enormously much energy, which naturally makes them warmer and begin to radiate light. This light radiance is visually a fireball, but it is not a fireball.
Examples:
It is similar to our sun. There’s almost no oxygen in her.
Still, she looks like a giant fireball. The reason for this is precisely the nuclear reaction, the nuclear fusion, as is also carried out in hydrogen bombs.
If you want a real example without oxygen, a supernova (the explosion of a massive star) would be a good example:
No oxygen has to be present in a mass-rich star. Nevertheless, he goes up at the end of his “life”.
The luminosity of the star increases million to billions, it becomes as bright as an entire galaxy for a short time.
And that without oxygen.
Theory and practice had never fallen in love at first glance and the calculations made for it always had a good approach…
So oxygen doesn’t burn first. A combustion is an exothermic redox reaction in which an energy-rich reducing agent is oxidized by oxygen, which is thereby reduced. Oxygen is the oxidizing agent, not the fuel.
Consequently, your comment is simply technically wrong.
On the other hand, a match is obviously a fuel that is burned by oxygen. A nuclear bomb is not a fuel.
Thirdly, we do not have 21% oxygen everywhere in the atmosphere. As the height increases, the average molar mass of the air decreases. Oxygen has a molar mass of 32 g/mol, i.e. is comparatively large, and with increasing height the oxygen content also decreases.
Lastly, alkali metals and alkaline earth metals are so strong reducing agents that they themselves can reduce carbon dioxide. So it is not necessary to keep oxygen alive in order to burn.
first comes the light flash and then the fireball, you can’t tell me that at 6000° Celsius the oxygen is still there…
OK.
But at over 6000°C the air starts to burn. Such a high heat doesn’t hold anything but nothing stood…
The oxygen can in fact decompose into atoms at these temperatures and be partially ionized or, in other words, plasma is formed. However, the ionized oxygen will then directly react again, and oxygen molecules and nitrogen gases will probably be formed again. That’s what it was.
yes sry, all over the world, and tiredness, I get a little messed up…
Oxygen is not the same as hydrogen, you nose.
Hydrogen begins to split itself from a temperature of 1.700° C. and the heat from a fat man is approx. 6000°C
then read this and tell me that’s not true!
Hey, I’d like to make your comment a favorite, but don’t go;(
A nuclear bomb is nuclear fission, which has (for itself) NOT to do with oxygen, fire, combustion or the like!
The following(!) Fires consume oxygen, but they could also be caused by flashing, short circuit or conventional bombs…
By the way, the ignition kit of the atomic bomb is explosive, has its oxidizing agent already in itself and therefore no air oxygen is needed for this…
What do you have with all your oxygen questions??
in most burns with welding equipment, oxygen is always added.
and such a flame has approx. 800 degrees and consumes oxygen and thus an atomic bomb explosion has up to far over 6000° so burns quite much at the center of the detonation. The calculations should be turned into the world, water and space…
inert gas welding also works without oxygen😌
You’re bringing some things together (intentionally?)
A firewood consumes a lot of oxygen… However, according to your “logic” one would have to add the oxygen that the fire of a complete forest is consumed if one keeps said match only in the “right” place…
But that’s Mumpitz!
Combustion is not dependent on a temperature, but rather as oxidation, i.e. as i.d., clearly exothermic chemical reaction…
The sun is also hot, yet it burns up pure nix, but it runs out of nuclear fusion…
The nuclear reaction is a (intentionally) uncontrolled chain reaction of nuclear fissions and which runs completely independent of the presence of oxygen, air or anything else, i.e. in space, under water or underground…
All the other are physically and chemically independent follow-up events, so to speak the forest fire in the above-mentioned strikewood example – are (of course) in the responsibility of the bomb igniter, but are never part of the atomic bomb explosion as such…
Now understandable?
just because you don’t need it(oxygen), it doesn’t mean that without going on in our world to start a huge fireball and keep the light flash alive.
I don’t say that – tell me what’s your (misunderstanding) problem?
read the request myotis
Did I read – but you didn’t? Air burns like it is not with us!! In very small quantities, nitrogen oxides are produced by flashes, but a few com besidedran is already over again…
By the way your answers (“I would say yes, because hydrogen is present and which splits into hydrogen and oxygen, and that is already from a heat development of 1,700°C!“The hydrogen obtained from water splits from 1,700° C., which is already solid…” etc.) are still the same scam – with permission – with which we started here…
Hydrogen does not split, even in view itself AND oxygen…
And the division of water from 1700 degrees – see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/hydrogen production#Thermische_Dissoziation – doesn’t work as easy in the wild as you imagine!
If the hydrogen is not immediately separated from the oxygen by membranes, they are immediately reconnected…
So what is the profit of having only hot air in the truest sense? Even if there is some hydrogen and oxygen separated at short notice, it is the same steam as before… So it burns nix!!
Hydrogen begins to split itself from a temperature of 1.700° C. and the heat from a fat man is approx. 6000°C
What do you want to split hydrogen?! The core is made of ONE proton, there is no…
So I can start with the temperature 1,700 degrees nic, where did you get that from?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Man#Structure consists of berryllium, plotonium and uranium – what does this have to do with hydrogen?
I don’t know where you got the temperature of 6,000 degrees.
Let’s go. https://www.geo.de/amp/wissen/23157-rtkl-atombomb ejection-before-75-year-old-attack-on-nagasaki-als-fat-man-ten000
“Fat Man is a plutonium bomb with even greater explosive power than the Hiroshima bomb. Within 0.1 milliseconds turns it into a fireball, 15 meters wide and 300 000 degrees Celsius hot.”
moin,
I have learned that an atomic bomb explosion of 60°C rises to 100 million degrees C and that in a period of max 0.1 seconds. This state is also called plasma and simply burns everything, no atom can resist this heat…
Another (last) time: you talk about (unimaginable) heat, which is what Other like the burning chemical reaction of oxidation!
Period.
So get stuck and good night!
It splits at 1700 degrees, but with some cooling the components react again to water – before that the same…
sry I meant water vaporized from a temperature of 100°C and further to the cleavage of 1.700°C
No matter…
The boiling point https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfram is close to 6000 degrees = it is then in the form of a gas…
The question, however, goes back:
then tell me what 6000°C can stand and under water or in space doesn’t count here…
The fact that energy is released in all three cases and that heat is generated is clear…
And WENN is a bit combustible nearby, it burns (in the sense of redox reactions)…
ABER the atomic mushroom is like the volcanic smoke column or the firestorm only ONLY hot air, because nix can burn: nitrogen is in the atmosphere i. W. inert and water vapor does not burn…
Even WENN was burning (Hieroshima on the ground…) this is not part of the atomic explosion but FOLGE… – finally understand and begin to separate the physical and chemical processes…
If oxygen consumption is part of the atom explosion, this could not take place without oxygen – which is definitely not that!
The sun has no oxygen at all, so it cannot burn i. S. a redox reaction – that does not mean that the fusion ran endlessly…
Another name for nuclear fusion is, fortunately, “hydrogen burning” in our context, but it is NOT the oxyhydrogen gas reaction (2 H2 + O2 -> 2 H2O)! During the fusion, hydrogen is “consumed” and helium is produced (4 H -> 2 He in a plasma)…
At the end of the process (after many millions or billions of years) the so-called https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumburn a: from a total of 3 helium-4-cores, carbon is produced via an unstable beryllium isotope …
OK.
but an atomic explosion creates an extremely bright light flash and a fireball. You can’t tell me that no oxygen is burned. As already mentioned, about a heat of 6000° is produced Celsius and this has just the sun, which is also a burning ball, but in the interior of the sun it is up to 15 million degrees Celsius only WARM. Just say that the sun doesn’t burn, because then it would keep infinite, but there is a reduction included, which makes it age and takes up.
Oh haue haue haue…
You really think that?
Okay, another try:
the sun fusions from a certain heat, hydrogen (H2O) and thus H and oxygen are split.
In an atomic chain reaction, the nuclear cleavage is required. Neutrons are brought to the cores and thus several neutrons are formed again.
Burning is a reduction.
A long flash of light is produced in the nuclear fission, which produces both heat and light and redox reactions are added.
I think you’ve got a real problem burning the term, right?
Burning in the sense of hot are just three different things here!
Nuclear fusion ≠ Nuclear fission ≠ Chemical oxidation!!
Oxygen is only used in the latter…
some reactions only arise from a certain heat. Merging in the sun, “VERSCHMELZEN” just a few “hydrogen atoms” to helium. The sun consumes itself… through eternal fire(only a few million years). In the outer of the sun a heat of about 6000°C and in the inner up to 15 million degrees Celsius is produced and there nix…?
The sun only burns through the hydrogen and its interactions
No one. It would also work in a vacuum.
this is not very educational, at an A bomb comes first the light flash and then the huge fireball and pretty much everything evaporated in this sector. This results in a heat of about 6000° Celsius. And in a sun it starts at about 6000° Celsius and in the inner it is 15 million degrees Celsius.
Just because something is not needed to start it does not mean that it also consumes when it expires.
another question to you:
Does an embryo not need oxygen to live because it does not even breathe?
You’re getting closer to the conspiracy. 60,000C.
Didn’t you ask how much 0C it gets warmer on Earth? This releases enormous amounts of energy, which ultimately become heat. With each of the previous 2000 atomic bomb tests.
https://www.atomwaffena-z.info/geschichte/atomweaponstests/list-aller-tests.html
And all of this, oxygen doesn’t matter.
in an A bomb explosion, a plasma of 100 million degrees Celsius is produced and within a maximum of 0.1 seconds. And this area is about 2 km2 tall and no atom survives this heat…
6.3 x 10high5 m3 oxygen
about 630,000m3?
About
and how did you get the information?
estimated
He doesn’t check…
This depends on what’s being burned by the explosion. Even the open sea is nothing.
a heat of about 6000° and a fire with the heat of approx. 1k° is enough to burn oxygen…
Btw. There is no heat. Energy in the form of heat becomes free, thereby increasing the temperature. Moreover, temperature is not an angle, but a measure of the mean kinetic energy of the particles of a system, i.e. is measured in a temperature unit such as K, °C or also °F, not in °. And last but not least, I’ve never seen anyone write “k°C” in the lab. You don’t. One size always consists of a ZAHL AND an UNIVERSITY. Thus, if, then 1 k°C, it would be better to simply 1000°C or 10^3 °C.
Oxygen alone does not burn you, it is an oxidizing agent and the oxidation of a reactant DAS is then burnt…
do we have no particles in the air or cloud formation on the sea?
So you also believe that an embryo does not need oxygen to live, and finally it does not even breathe!