Wie viel Nikotin hat diese Vape?
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Dieses ebike für 320€?
Ich suche ein ebike für die Stadt, einfach um etwas rumzuraddeln. Hab das auf ebay gefunden für 320€ ist das ausreichend? Kenne mich leider nicht aus Rahmen: Aluminium-Herren-Rahmen Rahmenhöhe: 54 cm Farbe: Schwarz Motor: ANANDA bürstenloser Gleichstrommotor 36V / 250W Akku: GREENWAY Li-Ion, 36V / 10,4 Ah, Kapazität 374,4 Wh, abschließbar und transportabel Ladezeit: 6-7…
Gibt es Akuuladegeräte die bei vollgeraden die Lampe auf grün springt?
Ich suche für Akkus laden ein ladegerät wo die lampen bei vollem Akku auf Grün springen und nicht rot bleiben -kennt jemand solche Geräte?- alle geräte bei Mediamarkt die ich bisher hatte hatten duiese Funktion nicht
Warum trinken viele so gerne Bier?
Ich hasse es , es gibt nichts aber jeder trinkt gerne Was ist daran so toll
Schlüsselfinder mit GPS Tracker?
ByMarvolo
hallo liebe Community, Ich suche einen GPS Empfänger für meinen Schlüsselbund. Habe vor paar Monaten meinen alten Schlüssel mitten auf der Autobahn leider verloren. Dies möchte ich mit meinem neuen Schlüsselbund vermeiden weshalb ich mir einen GPS Empfänger zulegen möchte, den ich bei Bedarf orten kann. Nach einiger Recherche bin ich auf ein paar Schlüsselfinder…
Rauchen aufhören?
Wie kann man es schaffen mit dem Rauche aufzuhören ich werde nächstes Jahr 60 und rauche derzeit 20 Zigaretten am Tag und merke wie es mir gar nciht gut tut, wer hat es schon geschaffft und kann mir Tipps geben?
Vape nach 15 Tagen?
Hab mal eine Frage. Auf der Verpackung einer Elfbar steht drauf ja innerhalb von 15 Tagen verbrauchen. Ich möchte mir aber nicht jeden Tag 40 Züge, was also 4 Zigaretten entspricht, reinziehen. Kann man die 15 Tage überschreiten? Danke schonmal
15k. is also up there but would not recommend you to order if you had that, in the internet is much more expensive than if you buy it in a sishashop
This number has with the amount
of nicotine nothing to do!
yes bro is the number of suits, do you see a number of ml somewhere?
Ne .. nix “bro”… 🤦🏻 ♀️
I advise you to vape at all. You’re 16, maximum 17 and that means that your brain is still growing. With alcohol, nicotine and all other drugs, you’ll cause major damage because they affect the development of the brain.
Nicotine is not a drug.
Regarding nicotine’s harmfulness potential, what do you think is how high it is when something is officially available from 12 years…
Harmfulness of nicotine: irrelevant for adults, but it is a danger to the DEVELOPMENT of the brain. And with 16 or 17 years, the brain of the questioner is not fully developed.
Nicotine is NO drug
and nicotine does not judge
Damage in the brain or elsewhere!
In the child’s brain already.
because they affect the development of the brain. – nope… doesn’t make nicotine.
WHO, NIDA, RKI, CNC, NIH, APA and AAP say something else.
But you should do that before you draw false conclusions again!
Exactly, that’s why you’ve made a number of criminal statements here.
Knowledge is knowledge. How was that with the IQ?
Serious German Sudien you reject the German laws.
Your statements are becoming more and more blurred…
Our studies are completely irrelevant!
Are you coming over with something serious?
Otherwise, I would devote myself more importantly.
I do not know if I have overlooked some of his publications, but the linked talk mainly about vapes and when it comes to nicotine, he does not relate directly to children or not fully trained brains.
My “Thema Missed” refers to Bernd Mayers, whom I have read and in which no direct reference is made to children and their development in connection with nicotine.
However, as it is at present, these publications are beautiful, but they do not say that nicotine is safe for a child.
Forgive me if I read something, but what source did you deliver that says that nicotine does not leave any damage in a growing brain?
For bad renunciation and slanderment, I still have to be aware that I am meeting a false statement, which is obviously not known, you lawyer! If I have not read anything about what is quite possible in this news flow, I have not heard any argument that proves exactly that. I don’t count your knowledge as an argument, so sorry I am. There must be something more reliable and I sent you further studies under the other comment.
FALSCH! You’re on the threshold of lustful excuse and slander!
Of course he did. You just have to read or listen. However, it is unnecessary to stay longer on the subject, because at the latest in connection with other products that do not represent medicines, such as the nicotine products available in the pharmacies, everything is from 18.
What should I call you in such statements? Dumbs, stupid child or how would you like it? I don’t want to offend you, so my question. What you get out of here is once again a criminal relevance!
To date, you lack all the evidence you wanted to provide.
Apart from our own studies and links without context, so far nothing came from you…
And you could, for your point of view, make nicotine harmless even for a youthful brain.
Bernd Mayer has not written in any of his publications that nicotine is also harmless for children.
I therefore consider this to be missing the subject.
What do you want with this unselfish study?
Did you even read it? If so, what I doubt, you obviously didn’t understand them.
There, old studies (smoker studies) were used to conclude from the data on nicotine, which is now not possible seriously.
A short quote, translated for you: Since there are few existing studies on humans who investigate the effects of a pure nicotine exposure, we have included in this review in vivo, in vitro and human smoke exposure studiesIn order to determine the likelihood of nicotine exposure solely in the cause of adverse health consequences during development.
It’s always wrong if you like nicotine and tobacco or use one for the other.
Still, you could not lead a single serious study…!
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/145/3/e20191346/36863/The-Effects-of-Nicotine-on-Development
Another publication.
Nevertheless, it would be a false statement in the study to write nicotine instead of tobacco.
Yeah, that’s how it’s about smoking studies.
You misjudged the context, apart from the age of the study…
There is how nicotine influences the development of the brain. It’s about nicotine, not smoking. Otherwise there would not be “Nicotine”, but “tobacco”.
What do you want to tell the sentence?
Studies are always considered in context!
No one contested. This, however, does not lead to factual, scientific reports or studies.
A study of smoking. What do you want me to do?
FALSCH! It always refers to smoking, even if it has not been repeated in every sentence!
Was it with your studies?
Did you forget the pocket money paragraph?
I haven’t found this study anymore, but this is what this is:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543069/
Partly it refers to smoking, but partly also directly to nicotine.
You’re right, it doesn’t matter what I think it’s important, but it doesn’t matter what you find important.
These organisations are now renown, reputable and often quoted.
No scientific and serious study is hidden.
This is the legal regulation. Toddlers are not businessable!
Who cares what you care about…
Well, that would be your first real contribution.
The magic word is
Prof. Dr. Bernd Mayer ….
https://e-dampfen.info/wissenschaft/veroeffentlichungen-von-dr-bernhard-michael-mayer/
https://www.vapers.guru/2016/01/11/nicotin-real-so-faehre/
Source? And why is it only possible from 12 onwards to legally arrive at nicotine?
You still hide 6 of the most prestigious health organizations and have no source of nicotine damage to children.
I’ll turn your argument over.
Why is ERST AB 12 legally possible to get to nicotine?
Forgive me if important health organizations are more important than your knowledge.
If you give me some time, I’ll find out the study that NIDA has conducted on this topic.
Let’s finally be your steadfast claims!
Neither PachamamaSquaw, nor sunnymarie32 or I argue with the pharmaceutical industry. That would then at best be an assertion.
We make it clear, because it is proven and knowledge.
You don’t like it as a child. Perhaps the context is too complex to you. However, there are facts!
And again you work with insane submissions!
This is not about opinions. This is reality and it is facts!
You tell total nonsense
In this case, and this refuts your argument that this is paid by the pharmaceutical industry, no type of industry has an interest in it.
That means you’re blinding 6 of the world’s most important health practices because they don’t support your opinion?
Do you have a source that nicotine is also harmless for a brain that is not fully developed?
beautiful for those who claim but also a lot of other things that then turn out to be untrue… the WHO is an excellent example for this.
Forgive me, I forgot the end.
That’s exactly what you write!
I’m blinding studies????
What a bullshit!
How to dazzle studies?
Is that a child’s chat?
I don’t throw nicotine into a pot with more dangerous. It should only be examples that
(partial)legalization does not make a substance harmless.
You are blinding studies by WHO, RKI (of which you seem not to think), but also NIDA, CDC, NIH, APA and AAP.
However, these studies cannot be paid studies of the pharmaceutical industry, because they have no interest in it.
WOW… now you throw dangerous drugs into a pot with safe nicotine!
FALSCH!!!
It would be correct with cannabis, with nicotine it is wrong!
Not under 12 years, but about youthful 16/17 years. It won’t be harmless. The development of the brain is not yet completed!
Nevertheless, it is of course worse for a 12-year-old child than for a young person.
Excuse me, if it’s not a child anymore, that was stupid, but the brain is not mature.
That it is available from 12 does not change that it is harmful. Cannabis and alcohol are also available from a certain age!
The brain is fully developed in the middle of 20. Until then, the development can be hindered by various substances, including nicotine.
That’s what NIDA confirmed. I assume this is a term for you?
FALSCH!!!
Nicotine is officially available from 12 years!
Here we go
not for children under 12 J.❗️
This is irrelevant as this part is in the TOTAL EU are prohibited as the more than 2ml liquid have and also exceed the limit of 20mg/ml.
With consumption – at least in STRAFTATE!
What is it? for you for a role?
How would you like to know how old I am?
Your other questions…
I can read.
That was a suggested username because no other was available
What’s your name got to do with it?
I just don’t understand why they are forbidden – they are prohibited because they do not comply with the statutory requirements for e-cigarettes. Here, among other things, the filling quantity is much too high, because there are max 2ml liquid allowed… and then there are other rules such as “must be logged in, 6 months after registration must not be sold out
I just don’t understand why they are forbidden
Because I can read
No, what do you think?
So you’re 32?