Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Giovanni47
1 year ago

100% security is nowhere in our lives, we can already have a serious accident in our own apartment. The railroad is a very safe means of transport,the kind of catastrophes are extremely rare, Eschede is also back for more than 25 years. Enjoy the ride and reserve a seat.

catweazle01
1 year ago

Clearly safer than the car!

The safest way is to travel by bus and train, closely followed by the plane. Fact is: Statistically speaking, the chance to evacuate in the aircraft is about 1 to 188.364 and is therefore much lower than in a car.

notting
1 year ago
Reply to  catweazle01

Can it be that in statistics the people who are not actually driving by train, but are not injured/killed by a train?

Notification

catweazle01
1 year ago
Reply to  notting

Statistics are about which means of transport you use and which one. Safest is

catweazle01
1 year ago

Look at the source yourself, maybe you better read it yourself. Google: Which means of transport is most secure

notting
1 year ago

But then they’ll have to be in there to get a train. Everything else would be inconsistent.

Notification

catweazle01
1 year ago

Then you got that wrong. If you hurt someone with your car and he was in his car, then of course he’s in the statistics!

notting
1 year ago

Okay, so security for others than yourself is irrelevant. Well, then you don’t need to worry about the injured other road users anymore.

Notification

Jack98765
1 year ago

Is that thing even safe?

Of course. As safe as any other train.

The reason for the tragedy of that time is well known and has been eliminated.

MarSusMar
1 year ago

Super safe

If only one of the passengers had reacted with Eschede when the rail head got through the ground, absolutely NOT would have happened. And you can’t say. It’ll have a reason, but it doesn’t matter. A piece of metal does not come through the floor without any reason…

This can happen with every metal wheel.

It doesn’t matter what happens to me. Top current,

A road driver finds a six-year-old on the train. Blood in the mouth, blood on the bottom of the little one does not know where. First someone who’s just approaching says it. No one in it has helped or I told you.

spelman
1 year ago
Reply to  MarSusMar

“… if only one of the passengers had reacted…” – Can you explain this for a moment? What could the passengers have done? Would it have been time?

MarSusMar
1 year ago
Reply to  spelman

A mistake from me, it was not the rail head but the wheel tire* of the high-rise.

There the wg. Material fatigue broke, he didn’t come as a whistle, but he was pushed up. I’ll tell you that’s probably been 1/2 minutes. For this purpose, trays have a metal layer. So he came so high that enough time would have been to roar if one did not sit on the emergency brake itself. They usually have every second, sometimes third window.

By the way, pulling is not a force transmission, but only a message to the locomotive driver, which then finally triggers the emergency brake.

Without the bridge, the train with the one car would be standing.

*Red tires are shrunk onto the actual wheel. To be able to dive when you get too narrow, so how to lose the car profile. This doesn’t have to change the whole wheel.

Giovanni47
1 year ago
Reply to  MarSusMar

That’s right. If we had been in this car, we would have had the courage to pull the emergency brake.

MarSusMar
1 year ago
Reply to  Giovanni47

That with the courage is the problem…(If you don’t help children.)

I am

I’ve been training half a locomotive. According to the theory, the whole group was complimated out of cross-education with fake test results. This has had to do with the Great Railroads 2011 and our contracts. We’ve all understood that technically we didn’t. But the employment office knew.

The passenger gets trouble for triggering without reason, but because the driver has to write the process, not the passenger explain why.

MarSusMar
1 year ago

He came through the ground High The photos gave at the time

I just wrote Giovanni47

The passenger gets trouble for triggering without reason, but because the driver has to write the process, not the passenger explain why.

Time is an argument. But nothing to do is what is different from reacting.

spelman
1 year ago

I remember that wheel tire. I wonder how it was for passengers. If the wheel tire tears up, then he might hit the Wagon floor, maybe he beats himself and drags over the track. this should have caused considerable noise in both cases. But as a passenger to conclude that there is a dangerous situation, you cannot expect. People will have wondered. If the train driver had been there, they would have asked him. But to pull the emergency brake – it is always said that abuse is punishable. And who wants to take this on his cap?

The question is, however, whether it had changed anything. Brakes also take his time with an ICE.

retzi1
1 year ago

Just as safe as other trains. The cause of the tragedy has been found and has long since been resolved.

The probability of an accident is significantly lower than in road traffic.

Zug2023
1 year ago

Super safe

If only one of the passengers had reacted with Eschede when the rail head got through the ground, absolutely NOT would have happened.

treppensteiger
1 year ago

Even if an ICE gets out, it doesn’t have to have as bad consequences as in Eschede. Unfortunately, there was also a bridge in the way where the wagons were pushed together.

LilPeep15112017
1 year ago

Safer than driving by car 🙂

AlbertHnsl
1 year ago

Every year thousands of ICEs travel through Germany without accidents. You’ll survive.

rosarot405
1 year ago

no he can escape

PeterP58
1 year ago

Pretty sure!

According to statistics: A ride by car is 63 times more dangerous! 🙂