Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Janaki
2 years ago

That’s the point. But if you turn them around – birds are dinosaurs – they are simplified, but they still contain a true core – because our birds have evolved from Dinos, as shown by the Archaeopteryx.

PWolff
2 years ago

From the original meaning (great lizard) not at all. The largest contemporary bird, the African bouquet, is up to 2.5 m high and 135 kg heavy, which is impressive in itself, but certainly not compared to other large animals.

https://www.google.com/search?q=dinosaurier+etymology

https://www.google.com/search?q=ster+air incapable+vogel+der+welt

As far as the descent is concerned, one could say with much more permission, the Cro-Magnon people would be Western Europeans of the 3rd. millennium n.C.

Munga01
2 years ago

She’s not true.

Birds are related to the descendants of the Dinos and with them. Dinos aren’t birds.

AnakinZockt
2 years ago

If one assumes that the birds are descending from dinosaurs, it does not mean these birds are.
You’re not your father because you’re from him.

Velbert2
2 years ago

At best very short. Dinosaurs are, under certain circumstances, early ancestors of birds.

Zwitscherling
2 years ago

About as much as monkeys are people.

LG.

Wiesel
2 years ago

With respect to the hollow bones, it is partly true.

eieiei2
2 years ago

Each bird is a dinosaur, but only a small minority of dinosaurs are birds.

If you want to call dinosaurs cadistically as a monophyletic group, you must count the birds among the dinosaurs without restrictions.

Buckykater
1 year ago

They are at least the direct descendants of the dinosaurs and with certain dinosaurs the closest relationship. I wouldn’t call her a dinosaur.

Rosswurscht
2 years ago

The statement is wrong.

gregor443
2 years ago

I think this statement is wrong.