How do you calculate that?
Hello, I have a math test tomorrow and I don't know how to calculate the example, please help me 🙁
Fractional terms
Hello, I have a math test tomorrow and I don't know how to calculate the example, please help me 🙁
Fractional terms
I don't get why this is a right angle
What has always bothered me about the Planck units as "natural" units is that they do not fit at all with the experimentally determined "natural" units. For example, the Planck charge is 11.71 electron charges, not one electron charge. However, this additional factor is obviously 1/√α (with the fine structure constant α ≈ 1/137). Or…
Hello I'm totally desperate about my physics homework and I don't know where to start… It would be really nice if someone could help me 🙂 Thank you in advance! A car (m1 = 4 kg) collides with a speed v1 = 1.2 m/s with a second car (m2 = 5 kg) which is moving…
Can someone please help me with b and c? I don't really have a clue about the b, but the current flowing from A to B should be equal to the current flowing from B to C. And the total current of a loop (e.g., the loop between A and B) is calculated by adding…
I'm having a bit of trouble with this problem. I know that with substitution, I get u(x) = square root x^2 -1. After that, I have to find the derivative of u(x). That would be u'(x) = 2x du/dx, which I can then simplify to u'(x) = 2x dx. This is where my problem comes…
In order to be able to add/subtract two fractures, the denominators must be the same, i.e. You’ve got to find the chief man here. In this case, the “smallest possible” is desired (you could also simply expand the first break with the denominator of the second and the second break with the denominator of the first one, but with, for example, 1/2 + 1/4 you don’t…).
To do this, you “factorize” the denominators and see what factors may already be in both denominators, and then expand with the factors that lack one break compared to the other. At 1/2+1/4 you have only the 2 and 4=2*2 at the front in the denominator, i.e. in the first denominator is a 2 too little, so you would expand there with 2 and come to 2/4+1/4 and can then summarize.
In your example, you can clip the 3 in front of the denominator and binom in the second denominator. Use formula. That is, you get 3(x+y) on the one hand and on the other (x+y)(x-y). That is, the “smallest” main user is 3(x+y)(x-y). And that means that in the first denominator the factor (x-y) is missing, i.e. You have to expand this break with it, and in the second, the factor 3 is missing, that is, this break with 3. Then you can combine both fractures that now have the same denominator.
you have to remember: sixth class: clipping. 5th class : binomic formula . This is more for smart women !
3(x+y)
(x+y)(x-y)
Heads therefore
only (x+y)(x-y) , because the 3 can be shortened
.
3(x+y)
.
3(x-y)/(x2-y2)
together
(3x-3y + 2)/(x2-y2)=