How do I objectify women in a feminist way?

Suppose I have the class "Human." Can I then derive the class Woman from it, or is that derogatory, since women are the same as humans? Is there some way to do this with aggregation?

Program in C++.

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nube4618
1 year ago

Think you’re going to class another class, e.g. woman. However, as the whole gender thing has many “sisters”, new ones are constantly coming to it, one could also add to the class “people” the class “bad”, which I would now rather consider.

Is a purely technical matter, with reduction or so the nix has to do.

BeamerBen
1 year ago

The question is, does inheritance make sense? You say yourself, women are a person with certain qualities, so why do extra categorizations if you can picture it?

Perhaps a class that can be expanded by composition instead of inheritance, people can have many properties, not only female or male. Do you manage a woman’s office business if you could simply combine a composition based on man with feminine qualities and qualities of a profession? If you need a male variant, you need an extra class?

Class thinking is weak.

So the question is actually Qautsch. From a social point of view and technical.

KarlRanseierIII
1 year ago

The sex is generally considered as a property (attribute) of a person, so there is no essential reason to derive specializations here.

apophis
1 year ago

Can I derive from her the class woman, or is that degrading because women are the same as a human being?

If your class “woman” is exactly the same as your class “human”, why would you even want to create the class “woman”?
If both are identical, simply take the class “human”.

Your choices in programming should already make sense. You shouldn’t just create any subclasses just because you can. All that does not fulfill any purpose is badly programmed.

Rymeru
1 year ago

There is woman and man finished