Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JollySwgm
3 months ago

It doesn’t necessarily have to be solid food. Liquid food is also sufficient to be able to live longer without any problems.

Siraaa
3 months ago

Without solid food, it doesn’t mean you don’t take anything. If the diet is otherwise ensured, this is absolutely feasible. For example, my buddy has been living without solid food for years and is fed parenterally via a catheter.

With complete renunciation it becomes more difficult and certainly depends on resources and activity (i.e. consumption). Someone who is already very slender and then perhaps also excessively moves will probably break together rather than someone who is overweight and then hardly moves and correspondingly consumes little.

Waldi2007
3 months ago

“Without solid food” does not mean “Ganz ohne Ernährung” for me, because you can still drink something tasty.

Without food, you can survive 30-50 days, that’s coming. This climate activist will have nourished himself with liquefied food – so he has still got nutrients and then it is clear that he is staying longer!

Waldi2007
3 months ago

Yes clear – also juice contains nutrients.

1akob
3 months ago

Depends on how much you move what you do.