Wie kann dieser Satz richtig sein?
Bedeutet “zu etwas/jemandem gehören” denn nicht: etwas/jemand ist ein Teil eines Ganzes?
In Anbetracht dieser Erklärung, wie kann folgender Satz richtig sein?
Der Relativsatz steht meist direkt hinter dem Wort, zu dem er gehört.
Wie kann ein satz ein teil eines Wortes Sein?
Yeah, but not always. It can also mean that two things have only some form of connection.
In your example, it is not meant that the relativity is part of the word, but that it refers to it.
I don’t understand you. I see various questions in your FT:
If a man belongs to a woman – and elsewhere – then they are still 2 parts. Two people. You’re not a single part! They stay 2 individuals. No one belongs to the other and they will not merge either.
I can’t say if the relativity is always behind the word he refers to. Mostly, it’s like that. I think.
A sentence is a sentence. It’s not part of a word.
I have said when “something belongs to” means: something/something is a part of a whole, how can a sentence be a part of a word?(In view of the sentence I wrote)
include – writing, definition, meaning, etymology, synonyms, examples | DWDS (means 3)
I still don’t understand.
How can a sentence be part of a word?
I saw the following sentence in a book:
The relative position is usually directly behind the word to which it belongs.
My God! Dictionary says:
” belong to something” means: something/someone is a part of a whole
so far okay?
No, it just presses a connection of some kind. This woman belongs to this man.
This woman belongs to this man.
What does this phrase mean in English?
Belongs to