Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Destranix
1 year ago

Autodidactic mainly. But it started with the fact that my father had shown me in very rough traits (up to the For-Schleife about).

ultrarunner
1 year ago

I taught myself, and there was no WWW at that time.

KloseGlott
1 year ago

By reading other sources

Nelson100
1 year ago

In principle autodidactical.

jentolon
1 year ago

and University

—-

can also be used at home

Singuli
1 year ago

To be able to program correctly, you have to complete a study. Everything else is bullshit.

Destranix
1 year ago
Reply to  Singuli

So…

I’ve completed a study, but how to program correctly, no one taught me that I had to find out for myself.

Singuli
1 year ago
Reply to  Destranix

Maybe something went wrong. Well, otherwise you could do all jobs after graduation. Nevertheless, training is necessary everywhere. And you have to gain experience, of course.

KloseGlott
1 year ago
Reply to  Singuli

Because you also learn to program in your studies.

Destranix
1 year ago

It’s okay. Economically, however, only requires the comparatively low supply of computer scientists.

Singuli
1 year ago

Shouldn’t this be punished?

Destranix
1 year ago

That’s why, yes.

However, there are also many people who can actually program and still write grayish code.
And companies that pay little for programmers and put them under time pressure.
And other reasons for bad software.

Singuli
1 year ago

Therefore, the quality of software is so miserable.

Destranix
1 year ago

You can actually become programmers without all this. However, only because demand is large enough.

Training is also something different from studying, I can imagine that you learn more craftsmanship.

And yes, experience is of course extremely helpful.