What do you think about Smarties, better or worse than M&Ms?

What do you think about Smarties, better or worse than M&Ms?

and do you also think it is a pity that they no longer

as colorful as in the 90s?

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
StrongHeart
7 months ago

M&Ms with nuts I like something more than smarties, but both are delicious. I brought knight sports with smarties the other day. It’s in the rewe and it’s all right.

Kugelflitz
2 years ago

Smarties taste better. Unfortunately, we have only natural colors, which is why they are so pale and monotonous.

And yes, evil nestle. I’m angry. There are quite different exploiters in the world.

ALDT44
2 years ago

I like M&M’s more, there are them in as many variations as peanut, brownie, Salted Caramel and once there has been espresso 🙂

Okboomer99
2 years ago

Don’t eat both anymore, but I found M&Ms earlier better. I found the surface of the smarties kind of like paper moderate.

I don’t really like the colors because everyone tastes the same

MarkusJaja
2 years ago

in principle the M&Ms, but rather those manufactured in France than those from Poland, which are unfortunately only available everywhere

Cornsnake94
2 years ago

I kind of liked M&Ms better than I had eaten.
But those without nuts, so only chocolate.

I always didn’t care about the color, I think it’s more unnecessary that candy is so colorful.

Saim0n
2 years ago

I like M&Ms with peanuts, but I’m too expensive.

nooppower4
2 years ago

M&Ms quite different levels. There are real nuts inside

Smarties in principle just a few chocolates

Jogibaer2017
2 years ago

I liked as a child “Bonitos”. They were chocolates with a smile. They later became M&Ms, without the funny faces.

Jogibaer2017
2 years ago
Reply to  norules4life

If I remember correctly, on the back of the bags there were small comics with the smilies on it.

Jogibaer2017
2 years ago

And the chocolates with peanuts were called “Treets”. Only those, I think, were not as colorful as those of M&Ms.

Waldzwerg33
2 years ago

No

I’m thinking about my teeth.

Satiharu
2 years ago

belongs to Néstlé

They are boycotted.

That’s my opinion.

M&M belongs to Mars, which is also a giant. So there, no thanks

LG

Satiharu
2 years ago
Reply to  norules4life

If they are fair (which for me includes pet- & umelt-friendly) then probably.

Cornsnake94
2 years ago
Reply to  Satiharu

And unhealthy is both anyway, that comes to

Saim0n
2 years ago
Reply to  Cornsnake94

They are absolutely not unhealthy. Like almost all foods.

Satiharu
2 years ago
Reply to  Cornsnake94

Well, if you’re young, like me, and grew up with chocolate, that’s not an argument for me. Don’t see any damage yet. But of course you can also remember

Kugelflitz
2 years ago
Reply to  Satiharu

There are significantly worse groups than Nestlé. They’re harmless. Really harmless.

Satiharu
2 years ago
Reply to  Kugelflitz

They’re not Harmlos. But there may be much worse groups. No matter what, Nestlé is boycotted. At least of me

Satiharu
2 years ago

Interested not who, but whether (:

If only I do, okay. But if I convince another one, and this one again, then it changes rapidly. I also see it in other things, such as sugar-free or vegan. If a request is there, or better said, if one stands for its ideals, something is also developing in the direction

Kugelflitz
2 years ago

Unfortunately, large corporations are not interested at all, who boycotts them or not.

yaIIah
2 years ago

m&m’s better

yaIIah
2 years ago
Reply to  norules4life

ne likes the crispy dinger most