Wie findet ihr mein neues Foto (Natur) …?
(7 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Wie kann ich Körper mehr natürlich zeichnen?
Bylabouum
Ich habe normal immer nur Gesichter gezeichnet also sozusagen Portraits. Jetzt möchte ich auch gerne lernen Körper zu zeichnen und Hände, was ich auch oft mache in letzter Zeit. Aber irgendwie sieht die Haltung meiner Hände immer so unnatürlich aus und wenn ich Körper zeichne sehen sie so hart und breit aus ich würde gern…
Which name do you like best?
This is about a book character. And please don't write "nobody." I don't really like anyone either, but I don't have to like them.
An Leute mit Sehschwäche: Mit was geht ihr schwimmen?
Hallo, An Leute mit Sehschwäche: Mit was geht ihr schwimmen? Und wie macht ihr das beim Tauchen? Bei Achterbahnen oder Fahrgeschäften fühle ich mich mit Kontakltlinsen sicher, aber beim Schwimmen überhaupt nicht. Ich finde, wir haben voll den Nachteil 😬 Ich traue mich weder mit Brille noch mit Linsen ins Wasser. Ich trage maximal eine…
Hi.
You could have gotten a little closer, then the blossom would work better and would be a little bigger. Otherwise the photo has become beautiful.
I always like photos in nature.
I find the choice of the most helpful answer… interesting.
😉
Who gives the stars? The questioner, right?
Almost everything.
As I see, a lot has just been deleted…
Yes, dear renates and asterisks, we go absolutely compliant: taste is a matter of taste. Perfectly right. That’s all said.
😉
Perfectly right. 👍
That’s exactly how I see it, we’re going to be absolutely compliant.
You’re absolutely right, dear Renate. You said everything. 👍
Oh, no one doubts. I didn’t doubt that either. I’ve got the star award interesting found…
😉
And of course, someone can and must also find a technically misfortune photo great.
However, even in the case of photos, the flavors are enormously different. However, it does not change the facts that the only and only the questioner decides who and how often he distributes the star for the most helpful answer.
Nope.
No, there are at least some objective criteria for photos…
Very accurate!!!
Whether it’s bad or not bad, it’s in the eye of the viewer.
That’s what I see.
You know what a rhetorical question is? Or two?
Do you know what a bad photo is?
A reading tip: https://www.matthiashaltenhof.de/blog/imagecomposition/
The remaining tips are also worth reading. Just shoot a picture that you like, may be easy, but the other one must like it, the spectators.
TOP response!
Image quality, lighting, motif, composition and image presentation I find bad
that a seven-year-old would have done so
I don’t believe that… and the picture was made with a 300 Euro phone, which, according to test reports, has no good camera!
Not the camera is responsible for a photo, but the photographer!
I can also get nothing skewed with a 3000€ profile sheet! 💁🏻 ♂️
The image quality has nothing to do with the phone.
Theoretically.
My phone, for example, does not cost more than 60€ today, but make a page-filling photo in a high-gloss magazine!
aha? then I can also make good pictures with nem 60 Euro mobile phone
It’s not mine, for various reasons. For example, I find the main motif too dark, while the bright area in the background distracts too much.
But everyone has other claims.. if you like it, be satisfied
I don’t think the motive’s just getting off the stool. I’d have a little alienated, maybe in the way.
Well, it’s good that you once found a motive instead of just snapping into the landscape.
Bad: It is nothing too special and the motif goes under the 80% grass background. I’d have gone a bit closer.
In size might be a picture for the bathroom.
For a beginner
Everything is too fuzzy, the motive does not come to an end
Not my choice of words, but the picture is absolutely not good.
It looks like a yellow flower element has been mounted on an unsharp meadow photo; Green and yellow have no connection at all. They are on two levels that have nothing to do with each other:
The blossom looks like a yellow spot on an unsharp green image, which was also badly positioned in the image.
Rule number 1 ☝🏻
The light will direct the view!
In this case to the top left, but there is nix! 🤷🏻 ♂️
The yellow flower is placed too centrally and looks like a disturbing spot I would punch away!
So in terms of image design and illumination there is still plenty of air up there! 💁🏻 ♂️
Maybe something blurred, but beautiful colors.
But badly divided.
Completely unsharp, bad image composition, central object too small, too much “background”.
I wonder why did he take the picture? This lion tooth(?) is too zahm.
“Total crap” wouldn’t be my choice, but it hits the core of the thing.
Nice and simple. Not exaggerated.
Beautiful flower.
LG
Too few details, unsharp and too simple.
In principle, plants are good motives that do not run around.
with which phone did the picture or camera?
I think that was from a camera, but I don’t read to you any more. But in such motifs and daylight the smartphones usually come along.
Average, 08/15 allerwelt photos.
After all, the flower is sharp. Well, you can’t say much more. Closer?
This is how Lieschen Müller photographs.
… but it’s nothing special.
TOP!
I like
Sword 🤣
Slight and beautiful
Nix special. The image is by Google
Funny