Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrastor
2 years ago

Looks very much for me as if it were lacking in the basics, especially in terms of anatomy, wrinkles, three-dimensional design and light and shadow, and as if they were trying to conceal these defects by an excessive use of “circumsts”.

I’d advise her to practice the basics.

Lmorg
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrastor

I would say this picture is more abstract than that it should be realism. Abstract art doesn’t need it all (forcing) x)

Andrastor
2 years ago
Reply to  Lmorg

It seems to me more like an excuse… You should master the basics before you try to break them or ignore them.

And for the fact that the foundations have been deliberately broken, I do not see any signs above.

Andrastor
2 years ago

I would like to give tips on how to improve and how to count on where there is potential for improvement and how to improve.

Lmorg
2 years ago

As I said, in the above picture, I realize that the foundations are not controlled. Abstract intent.

Nuja, I can also see that. Why is that a problem? As I said, I also believe that we are not sitting here in front of a masterpiece.

I just think that the lack of knowledge of these basics should not stop anyone from taking a brush in their hands and painting it off. For as I said: Masters rarely fall from heaven and until you really are GUT in what you do/learn, like to pass years or decades (you leave “wonder children” outside).

According to my knowledge, Jackson Pollock has planned and designed all his pictures (as random and arbitrary they may appear) according to artistic principles such as the golden cut or the Fibonacci column.

For example, Edvard Munch can be taken as a counter-example – which has painted images in which wrinkles, light and shadow play or proportions are ensnared to virtually not present (“Ash”, “The woman in three stages”, Mother and Daughter”).

In the end, there is always someone who admires a yellow square on a white background, as well as someone who is amazed by a work of art from Da Vinci

Andrastor
2 years ago

The “solt” was meant in the sense of “it’s not a good idea”.

When I say you should tie up your shoes, I’m not prohibiting anyone with open laces. But if the person stumbles over the laces and learns how asphalt tastes, she will understand why I said “solt”.

As I said, in the above picture, I realize that the foundations are not controlled. Abstract intent.

And yes, abstract art also revolves around these templates. According to my knowledge, Jackson Pollock has planned and designed all his pictures (as random and arbitrary they may appear) according to artistic principles such as the golden cut or the Fibonacci column.

Lmorg
2 years ago

I meant the part with the “solt”. Who sets up the rule that you should be able to or master anything before you start working with (or against)? This doesn’t make any sense at all, because even those who dominate anatomy or shading, wrinkles etc. had to learn this first. Do you think they can’t publish a single picture as long as they haven’t perfected these “bases”?

I mean, of course this picture shown here is not perfect. But if one wants to place value on realism and/or necessarily realize that the artist also puts a Da Vinci in the shadows. Because abstract art does not revolve around all these foundations. Well, that’s at least my opinion.

Andrastor
2 years ago

That’s logical. How do you want to break something artistic if you don’t know and/or master it? You can see whether a person has the idea of anatomy has an anatomically incorrect image or has no idea of it.

Lmorg
2 years ago

You should master the basics before you try to break or ignore them

Well, I’ve never heard of it before and I’ve been painting/drawing for about 30 years.

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Just find the hair color slightly overcrowded (something too dark).

The hair thus penetrates somewhat too much into the foreground.

But overall I like it very well.

Lmorg
2 years ago

Not in the negative sense. I think it’s interesting, a little grotesque and strange.

Nothing I’d hang on the wall, but in any case something I can look at over a longer period of time to speculate what it could express. And also a little inspiring

YellPop
2 years ago

I had the choice between “inspired” and “outstanding”. But I can’t explain what I think so great about the picture.

mendrup
2 years ago

Coming and balanced. The red at the top of the left can become stronger in the core.

AliceundD
2 years ago

But a little creepy.

Bernhard230561
2 years ago

Fantastic!

TreuloseTomate8
2 years ago

Destructive