What do you think about that?
Two colleagues of mine had a discussion
The issue is this: One person has had a free TVNow trial subscription for a year because he uses a fake ID with fake data every month. Since the provider, unlike others, does not verify account details, this is not a problem because the user then cancels the subscription directly and no costs are incurred, i.e. the provider does not even notice. One person was upset that it was immoral and fraudulent and the other said it was only a trial subscription and the provider itself was to blame because it did not have any verification. What is your opinion.
(3 votes)
Loading...
Of course, this is a kind of fraud, but from my point of view in a less serious case – certainly there is no such thing legal.
He uses a loophole But I have tested this quite normal and the provider is far too expensive for the offer.This is not just for it, but I can understand.I asked him why he does it at all, because of the previews of shows like Sommerhaus, Berlin Tag & night etc. He actually only looks at content that in the FreeTV only last up to 1 week earlier😂😂
Well, it’s not that expensive (8€), especially since you can use it monthly. There is a larger fundus for this.
Mh, yeah, the tariffs were apparently changed. Advertising-free (“Max”) now costs 13€ after six months. I still have the old premium.
The premium version now costs 10 euros and compared to other streaming services of equal price, the offer is rather ridiculous.
I’m not okay. (As a “youth sin” may be fine.) By the way, the service has long been called RTL+.
I don’t like this mentality of some people wanting to take anything but free. I test the offer 1x and then decide for it or against it.
Yes may be, but I also understand him, as it is not worth the price.
Whether the offer is worth the price is a subjective opinion. A service is offered for which you pay correctly (after the trial month). Whether the service is good or bad is on another sheet.
If it weren’t worth it, he wouldn’t keep hoking on TVNow.
If you had read my answer carefully, you would have had to recognize my opinion
I didn’t even question that, it was only about the fact that you can evaluate a streaming offer objectively. This was just an objection to your statement of subjectivity and no legitimation to do so.
I understand. Only is this a free letter to be allowed to withdraw the provider with ever new fake accounts?
Of course, you would have to pay.But the offer of a provider can certainly also be assessed objectively.There I have to contradict.This is not about taste, but the breadth of the offer, if there is only very little to see for price X, the price ratio is not good, that is not subjective, but a fact.
He only has this to watch free content earlier in the Preview More not.
This is clearly fraud and is not possible!
Of course, it goes because he does it for a long time and where no plaintiff is no executioner. Not every person is a moral apostle and I think it’s already a difference whether people are mistrusted to enrich or do something.
….because the honest subscribers also pay for the achievements.
Yes, they should adjust their safety, that would be easy.
The companies are catching us everywhere.
They sell all your data.
Makes little sense
yes, but is just fair when he fucks her
😂😂😂that I tell him…I call him from now on TV Hood😂😂
yes, that’s clear, but my dates bring them something and they sell them all
and they always flick you everywhere
companies require zb from you money where they themselves know that they have no claim
simply because they hope you pay
I see it as a modern robin hood^
Yes, of course, my comment was only related to his data.It brings nix to sell because fake😂😂😂I also finds not bad and I would probably also do it if the scrap would irritate me.