Hello dear community,
I have a question regarding the product rule. When differentiating sums, the sum rule is used, which is differentiated summand by summand. Now, when I consider a product, I might also consider simply differentiating the two factors and that's it. I understand the product rule myself, but I don't know why the above is wrong.
Lg
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...In task 15a) I have side lengths b and a of 2.24a and c of 4.12. Is that correct or not?
I don't get it
Hello everyone, I'm currently stuck on this problem^^ I find the expression a little confusing: the inverse of B x A, inverse of A? Or what is the inverse sign outside the brackets supposed to symbolize? Can I simplify the expression, and if so, how? Do I now have to calculate the inverse of A…
Hi. I recently bought something from MMOGA, and now I have to send my ID to them to verify my authenticity. I was wondering if this is secure or not, and if there's any way I can redact it so that all the data isn't shown? And if so, what can I redact? Is the…
What is the difference between a cosine function and a sine function? They're kind of the same, only the cosine is shifted.
And that’s why your idea doesn’t work against 0 when crossing h.
Again I understood how to derive the product rule. My question was whether there is a reason why this is a doofe idea with the factorwise deriving.
That’s exactly my answer, why this is a stupid idea. You don’t understand. What I wrote should be true so that your idea could work. The equation behind your idea is wrong. Note the “is not equal“
derivation of f + g is f’ + g’
Discharge f*g is not f’
@evtldocha has already mentioned the evidence.