Why is there more sugar in a jar of red cabbage than in a bar of chocolate?
A bar of chocolate has about 60g of sugar and a jar of 600g red cabbage has about 80g
(3 votes)
Loading...
(3 votes)Loading...
(3 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Food poisoning or something else?
We made lasagne on Friday last week and of course ate it, along with apple pie and two of our class members ate a lot of lasagne and when we got home I was just texting one of them and then she wrote to me that I had puked and the other one puked on…
Do chocolate bars like Mars Snickers and Twix shrink or is it just me?
Were they bigger before?
Why is my hunger suddenly no longer satisfied?
Hello, I am 14 years old and weigh 40 kg. I am a very, very thin person and I hardly eat at all and don't really have any appetite (I'm not anorexic). A week ago I was ill for a month and a week and since then I've been terribly hungry and it never goes…
You can eat both
In principle, you can eat both, but it would of course be desirable to eat more of the red cabbage and for that it is relatively less of the chocolate. You don’t usually need to count the sugar extra (or as a diabetic you take a lot of insulin accordingly). But nevertheless, of course, there is also the possibility of preparing fresh red cabbage itself with correspondingly fewer sugars. However, the sugar in the red cabbage is also used for the preservation of the product.
I asked a manufacturer of red cabbage why there’s so much sugar in there. I think it’s unfit. There I was told that the trade specifies the recipes.
I was also advised to buy normal red cabbage in the future instead of “Delikatess red cabbage”, because there is a lot of sugar in it.
With a little sugar, the red cabbage is getting really good. My mother, who cooked the best red cabbage in the world, has always added red jam.
Hallihallo 🙋🏻♀️,
ich habe hier ein Glas Rotkohl und eine
Tafel Schokolade von Lindt mit 70 % Kakao.
Da für Diabetiker auf der Nährwerttabelle
nicht nur der Zucker wichtig ist,
sondern die angegebene Menge der KH:
100 g Rotkohl: 9 g KH = 9 g Glukose im Blut
100 g Schoki: 29 g KH = 29 g Glukose im Blut
Du musst also die 3,2 fache Menge Rotkohl
essen, um denselben Blutzuckeranstieg,
wie von der Schokolade zu haben.
Ein Unterschied besteht auch noch in
der Geschwindigkeit des BZ – Anstiegs.
Und:
Der Körper braucht für dieselbe Menge dieser
Schokolade die 3,2 fache Menge an Insulin, 💉
wie für dieselbe Menge Rotkohl.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Weil das Glas Rotkohl 600 g
und nicht nur 100 g hat.
Ein Glas Rotkohl mit 100 g hat
~ 1/3 weniger Zucker,
als 100 g Schokolade.
~~~~~~~
LG✌️🕊🇺🇦🕊🇺🇦🕊🇺🇦🕊🇺🇦🕊🕊🕊☮️
You don’t eat a glass of red cabbage at a meal. If you convert the red cabbage to the weight of a table of chocolate = 100 g., this is a bit:
80 / 7 = 11.42 g of sugar on 100 grams of red cabbage, the same amount of chocolate has 60 grams.
Actually, red cabbage is a very healthy vegetables: It contains vitamin C and B as well as iron and calcium.
Not?
In the case of red cabbage in the glass, quite a lot of vinegar is always used.
In addition, about 15-20 g of the 80 g of sugar are eaten with one portion. Who eats a whole glass of red cabbage at once.
One cannot compare 100 gr chocolate with 600 gr red cabbage. No matter the sugar or the price.
If you want to compare, you have to compare the same quantity for sugar and price… just make comparisons reasonably Sense.
Something might be added. However, it is worth to calculate how much comes to 100 grams. A table of chocolate typically has 100 grams. It’s a different house number than 600 grams of red cabbage.
100g chocolate have 19x 4g cube sugar = about 60 g
My chocolate has on 100 g
only 25 g of sugar (incl. 29 g of KH).
My red cabbage has
7.3 g of sugar (incl. 9 g of KH).
Yes and 100g red cabbage have 13,3g sugar according to your information
Because we told the others a glass of red cabbage has much more content than a 100 g table of chocolate. If you want to compare 600 g of red cabbage with chocolate, you also need to take 600 g of chocolate and the chocolate has more sugar (especially added sugar) than the same amount of red cabbage.
But this should actually be clear with something healthy human understanding and logical thinking
No, you like to upload to 6 tables to distract from the theme that in a glass of red cabbage with intention more sugar is mixed in than in a table of chocolate.
It’s logical that there’s more sugar in there. It’s also more mass. if you have a nutellar, then there will be less sugar in there than in 10 sugary cakes.
Hallelujah.
But what is this supposed to tell us? That it is healthier to eat the little cake than the 10 cakes? Only who, for heaven’s sake, stuffs up 10 cakes at once? That’s why we’re counting on reasonable amounts…
Somehow, your milk maid calculator is broken, I guess. 🤔
No wrong. If you want to compare something, you have to start from the same amount. You’re already learning this at primary school.
because more is… the board is only 100g;-) not 600g. Recree it in percent
Chocolate = 60%. Red cabbage = 13 %
The title is more than in a table of chocolate not in 6 tables. Let’s think
I told you. Why is more in 10 cube sugars than in 5 haha .. what should the cube
Or why is it in a mine that is the first of all barley and stones has more gold than in a jewelry store.
100g of chocolate have 60g of sugar.
100g red cabbage have 13.3g sugar.
Percentageally, red cabbage has significantly less sugar. Such a glass of red cabbage now has much more content than a table of chocolate.
A plaque has only 100 g of weight.
So compared to the glass of red cabbage (600 g) more sugar is in the chocolate table.
How much sugar is in a table of chocolate?
1 Table chocolate weighs 100 g. Contains Table 57 g Sugar, then I count 57: 3 = 19. The Table chocolate has a sugar content of about 19 dice sugar.
My chocolate has only
29 : 3 = 9,6 pcs of dice sugar.
I think everybody understood that now. 😏
Apart from the fact that you have to convert it to the weight of chocolate or red cabbage, finished red cabbage often has much too much sugar.
Table chocolate has 100g, so has 600g chocolate approx. 360 g sugar. What’s more sugar? Chocolate or red cabbage?
Because of the manufacturer, he makes so much sugar.
Buy a red cabbage at the vegetable counter, then you are much better and healthier.
then you have to have a lot of time to cook it.
The schokolode has 60g sugar on 100g
The glass rotkohk has reduced 13g sugar to 100g
Just think about it
Think about it!
He did, and that in a relative example correctly stated that chocolate contains more sugar percentage.
You can’t just compare 600g red cabbage with a table of chocolate of 100g.
It’s just crazy.
Consider how difficult a table is chocolate and how much sugar is then in e.g. 600 g chocolate…
Can you expect?
Then figure out how much grams of sugar are in 100 g of red cabbage.