Why is the thesis "atoms are indivisible" wrong?
(2 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Physics assignment on satellites (university)?
Hi everyone, I desperately need help with task c. I've been struggling with this task all week and trying different approaches, but it just doesn't work :(. Can anyone help me?
Chemistry acids?
Can someone please tell me the reaction equation for the dissolution process in water for hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid?
Calculate dilution chemistry?
Hello, I have a question about the following task: When preparing the reagents for determining water hardness, 3 liters of 4.5 M sodium hydroxide solution were mistakenly prepared. How much purified water should be used to dilute the existing sodium hydroxide solution to achieve the required concentration of 2 mol/l? My approach: You calculate the…
Calculate replacement resistance?
ByGuntamo
In a parallel circuit, the resistance R2 has 7 ohms and R1 is unknown. R2 has a current of 2 amps and R1 a current of 5 amps. How do I calculate the equivalent resistance?
Hydrogen fluoride, ammonia?
Hello, I don't understand why hydrogen fluoride can only form two hydrogen bonds even though the F atom has three lone pairs of electrons. Why can only one of them form hydrogen bonds? It's similar with ammonia. Why can't all three hydrogen atoms form hydrogen bonds? Does anyone know the solution?
The original concept of Greek philosophers of indivisibility (Atomos) for the smallest possible component of matter
With a scissors you can’t cut the pieces from which the scissors are made. That’s right. The basic idea is therefore conclusive.
It is possible to disintegrate atoms by shooting neutrons. The disintegration does not happen immediately, but nevertheless the causal chain of action can be assumed here, that the atom that shoots the neutron will eventually disintegrate, i.e., divide the atom.
What is in contradiction with the thesis.
Oh, the thesis is right. The Greek atomic means indivisible. Only this word was applied to the wrong particles which, after later research, were composed of other, smaller particles and thus have proved to be quite divisible. Otherwise, for example, there would be no nuclear power plants. The “real” indivisible particles, which would rightly earn the name atoms, have not yet been found afaik.
The thesis “atoms are indivisible” is wrong, as it contradicts the current scientific findings. The idea that atoms are indivisible building blocks of matter has long been considered as a valid assumption and was part of the Dalton atomic model, which was published in the 19th century. century was developed.
However, later discoveries and experiments have shown that atoms are actually divisible. The breakthrough came with the discovery of the substructure of the atom, in particular the existence of electrons, protons and neutrons.
The neutrons have always been there. But people think old things are new when they discover them. The new world (America), the new girlfriend or new citizen.
Don’t forget New Moon!
😉
Because the cause of this thesis is not yet understood.
I accept because they’re partable, otherwise the thesis would be right.
Sounds funny, but it is.
Because there are nuclear power plants