Why does a computer code meet all the requirements to be a universe itself?
Can't the function of a game's computer code, for example, be applied to the larger universe? Our universe has a natural source code and functions in a similar way? And the double-slit experiment shows that every process is only approximately simulated until you look?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
A computer and thus also a game works deterministic, i.e. unforeseen events will never occur. Games use a so-called sea to allow pseudo-random. From different inputs e.g. the system time a number is generated and, starting from this number, events occur. Since, for example, the system time always changes, even random events in the game never occur exactly the same, but they would, for example, by manipulating the game and bringing it back to a certain selected initial state.
Our universe, however, appears to be not deterministic, i.e. there is real chance at least at the quantum level. Particles do not have a fixed place in the universe, but their position is indicated with a probability of residence. A system takes in a superposition several states simultaneously and only after a measurement is the reduction to a single state.
But what if there is a seed at quantum level?
Then I guess we wouldn’t know this one.
Basically correct. But the world is too big and too complex. I find the episode of Rick and Morty very for explaining where the aliens are held captive in this pseudoreality.
Too big and too complex? For a human scale, but in the truest sense of the word, it would be very measurable to accept this scale… and that is exactly what it is about. A computer code would be much more energy-saving, only what is observed by light is simulated at quantum level. Stochwort double gap experiment
The experiment only says that a quantum particle decides for a position in the room as soon as it is observed. Otherwise it has another. There is more to the theory of multiverses than “We live in the matrix”.
This would also explain why the universe expands, the further you look the further it is simulated… moreover, nothing could be faster than light because light represents the simulation speed…
In the end, this rendering will be created for every person and every other being except your assumption is that the complete simulation is for you. And that takes a lot of power when it makes a central computer. But if every person renders himself, it is. And that’s what the brain does.
I don’t understand. What’s the target.
Gkaube we talk a little bit past each other but thanks for looking into the informatics. Can’t formulate what I want to express…
No, it doesn’t. If we involve the brain of a living being as a source of computation, a small meteorite will still be struck on the back of the moon without which a person will ever see it. The world continues without which it is looked at
I understand your approach but I want to clarify the question whether we can move away from the fact that there must be a source of computation for human understanding. What if the code is already the initial position and are called by energy certain parts.
If you break this up (I’m randomly programmer), then you have what you see, the frontend. So here you have different types of action. Let’s call them Mal Userevents. These have a corresponding effect on the frontend seen by you and by all others. There are also memories for memory, images, etc, which influence the decision paths of the machines (people). If one imagines that 1500 people on the Hamburger HBF are the frontend that they see each other repeatedly changing on the basis of their user events and that based on the information in the memory (decision finding). Is this inconceivable computational intensive. And since general things like weather, times (night/day) etc. are not included at all.
Okay would be an explanation! But my question: what if we move away from the fact that there must be a computer… what if the natural state of the universe is the code, that is, the pure information
But also a moment of decision. And then it is the observation, as in a simulation, which can also happen randomly.
Don’t understand your question. The codes from a game were written by people. The universe is not. So what do you mean?
The codes in a game are mathematical equations that were not written by people but discovered.
Where did you get that nonsense?
What exactly do you want to know?
Oh, yeah? What did they study?
I have sufficient knowledge, so I wanted to help. However, with your resistance, I did not expect, so sorry.
All good dega but do not play on themes where you have no idea
As you mean. I just wanted to help. Please excuse me.
Then ignore my answers. Thank you.
You probably didn’t enjoy professional training, that’s what you notice when you have no idea
No, thanks. I don’t want to have your level. That’s under my level.
No, the universe does not consist of information, information is how people perceive the universe.
There are no codes of binary numbers in nature. Binary numbers themselves are human invention to define something. 0 = current does not flow, 1 = current flows. This is not nature, but human definition.
It could theoretically also have 2 = current yes, 3= current no. But it was set differently.
You should still inform yourself extensively and not put everything on gold scale immediately.
I recommend you to be on the same level, sometimes the “Mathematics” of Arte. The mathematical equations, Pi, Fibonacci, natural numbers, have been described by man but have not been invented. Otherwise they wouldn’t be accessible to proof. These are discoveries. And since a computer code is composed of binary sequences of numbers, it also represents a natural entity, the person can only program it according to his wishes. Now the question: is that true? Everything in the universe consists of information, is there a natural code of binary numbers behind this information?
among the many misunderstandings about quantum mechanics, this is the most creative…
That’s why the question… why MISSVERSTÄNNIS?
Quantum states before the measurement do not differ in principle from those after the measurement; only other probability distributions are forced through the measurement. And both are equally real. The double-gap experiment forces a locating sharpness or a pulse sharpness, depending on what you do. But you don’t create something more real from something Irrealem.
but in reality, the condition is then in fact no longer. I think I have expressed myself wrong, I do not mean WIE a computer code, but rather a code that only consists of information. Each teul consists of information masse, spin etc.
A simulation follows solid processes, rules and conditions. Just like our world…just in a much bigger order.
That’s exactly what I’m asking