Why dignity form and not subjunctive 2?
A text says "One would probably hardly ever set foot on the moon again" and "But where would the projectile drift?" and the question is why the Würde-form was used here. Actually, you only use it when the subjunctive 2 and the normal form are identical, but that's not the case here. You could say "One would probably hardly ever set foot on the moon again" and "Where would the projectile drift?" So my question is why that doesn't work.
(1 votes)
Loading...
In regular (weak) verbs, the conjunctive 2 present is formed in modern German with a conjugated form of “worm” + infinitive, so:
In the case of irregular (strong + mixed) verbs, there are 2 ways to form the conjunctive 2 presence: a.) the strong form (conjugated preteritum strain with translucent at a/o/u), b.) the weak form as in the case of regular verbs with “worm” + infinitive, i.e.:
The tendency also tends to become weak in irregular verbs. You probably notice that when you speak and write yourself. “I went, he came” and especially “I know” you probably go over the lips, but “they humble” sounds pretty antique and like a lumpy guy who has little contact – except perhaps to his books.
Your phrases “You can hardly behave for the moon” and “Where did the bullet go?” are completely correct. If you want to speak and write, you can do that. Sometimes it is also possible to say a lot in the conjunction 2 and to use one or other verb two or three times. Then, of course, it is not so boring for you to change between “drive” and “drive”.
“behave/behave/modal verbs/it gives/knowledge (and some other verbs) you should always use the strong K2 form, so “whether, would be / could, should, it would have known.
Thank you, well explained, detailed answer
🌿🌷Thank you for your star. 🌺🍃
Because conjunctive 1 only refers to statements from other people for better understanding.
“Mrs. Mayer said she had already taken care of this matter.”
Although, that’s not true. You can also write about someone. For example, Carsten sleeps and dreams his last dream. He dreams he’s a bird and floats over the earth. Free …
Ok thank you, but those used in conjunction 2 are also more about things and not other people
No, no, I mean the testimony of other people. If you regain something that someone else has said, you use the conjunction 1, unless it’s a quote.
This is not about conjunctive 1 in the indirect speech, but about the conjunctive 2 as a form of opportunity. These are two pairs of boots!
And then why is the dignity form used twice and not the conjunctive 2?
Yeah, well, and that makes the sentences grammatically correct.
Conjunctive 1 is never about dignity-replacement form or conjunctive 2, for example, there is “He still hoped that the projectile only drove against the upper edge of the moon” and there is always used conjunctive 2 in the whole text except for the two sentences in question
I just had to improve. I mean, of course, conjunctive 1. That’s what you’re using to identify ideas that are not facts, but only wishes, for example.
Conjunctively two, in my opinion, is much more beautiful, but no longer familiar. It has become so common.
You can choose what you want. The would-form looks close to the crowd, with it you don’t feel negative. The conjunctive II sounds rather high. To use it requires more courage. (Who wants to be considered a raised snuff)
You can think that way. Personally, I think it sounds more beautiful to say that you don’t behave the moon.