Who has experience with the Samsung Evo 870 SSD hard drive?
Hello,
I wanted to buy the Samsung Evo 870 SSD 500 GB used as an internal hard drive. According to Amazon, it has excellent reviews.
But when you google "samsung 870 evo fails" you get a lot of negative reports, depending on the production date of this SSD.
What are your experiences with this Evo 870 SSD, when was it produced, and how long have you been using it?
Thank you in advance for your experience reports,
Reinhard
(1 votes)
Loading...
these are any kids who have no idea of computers and have built the thing with hammer and saw, or have put the Sata connector wrong (true story, with side cutter cut the guide clip…). Samsung is with the best brand when it comes to SSDs and storage technology. Don’t let that ssd be perfect.
And since you can even buy Amazon reviews, it wouldn’t surprise me if the other manufacturers played badly. Amazon reviews are absolutely worthless today and say nothing more.
Okay, there’s something. There should also be negative reviews hit by the competition so that they do not buy this product but their own.
But if still would have liked to read a few more experiences from 870 Evo users…
You don’t need it. Samsung is leading here. You can read it everywhere. Use only Samsung and WD. WD is also fine and a bit cheaper. Both are also installed in servers.
Info: DAS is NOT a hard drive but an SSD, just because some store markets titrate things as hard drives, it is not yet long
Hold on to Samsung. Some trust in it, others make a bow around it
And this is pure electronics installed here can start from: there will always be early total failures, which is normal
by the way, I still had to throw out a SSD on Sunday, which didn’t even hold half the TBW guaranteed by the manufacturer. So far, for this year, you already have 2 SSD total failures (both outside the warranty, but below the specified TBW) against 0 at HDDs
I realized that an SSD is not a hard disk.
Currently I have installed an 860 Evo 250 GB, which has been running for three years. SSD total failures also depend on whether it is from renowned companies such as Samsung, or from cheap producers.
NOTE
Last year, we had a distribution of 99% on SSDs from the disk failures, and it doesn’t matter if “renomed” company or “NoName”. that doesn’t matter
Or do you want to run Crucial (which on Sunday) under Noname or how you wrote “Billigst” producer!?
“then only a backup from my SSD” AH JAAAA helps. backUp is essential and not only since the SSDs are on the market
OK, then probably only helps a backup from my SSD on an external hard drive.
Because I don’t want to miss the much faster SSD than the old slow fesptlates anymore.
It’s a good ssd. Negative reports actually always have any product. Someone’s always got something to do.
Well. There are also application errors. But I have also often read about faulty sectors, and that the SSD was completely defective after a few months and then the PC no longer started.