Which WiFi router for gaming?
(1 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Should I wait to plug in the electronics?
The Starlink LAN adapter arrived today. I unpacked it right away. It was very cold on top and didn't heat up, but it went away after a minute. Should I wait a bit longer to plug it in? It's actually well-protected against moisture. I've already waited 15 minutes, and it's no longer cold. Can I…
Internet on laptop doesn't work, what to do?
I've tried everything Google and YouTube have told me to do, but can you please help me, it just doesn't work.
Problems with WiFi controller?
Good morning, I've been having a few problems with my wireless LAN controller for some time now. It's a Mediatek MT7663. It started with no networks being displayed, even though there were definitely some available. After a restart, however, everything was fine. Just now, nothing was displayed at all and the device manager said that…
I urgently need a swap. How do I find a trustworthy swap partner?
ByWapeUp
I urgently need crypto but can only offer gift cards in return, but I am pressed for time and do not know how to find a trustworthy exchange partner online, sites like Paxful only offer about 50% exchange rate
Is Dailymotion trustworthy?
Hello, Can I watch series legally and safely on Dailymotion?
Domain, home office problem with data access via link?
Hey, you probably know, or at least some of you know, the trick of providing data access via links. Many don't, so here's a quick rundown: Right-click and hold the file, drag it into your email, and send it to your colleague. When the colleague clicks on it, they'll be taken directly to the file….
If possible, a LAN cable is always best suited because it offers a stable connection.
I can always recommend the Fritzboxes if you have a bit of money, I’m always well driven, even when it comes to mesh or the like.
Otherwise, if the router does not have too many walls between you and you, every commercially available one is sufficient.
One that is fast enough for your current internet provider and line or meets their requirements.
Very common here are Fritzboxen.
My age is many years old, but it is still absolutely enough.
Each one fits your network type (DSL,Cable Internet/Glass Fiber) The quality of the transmission liin line.
Glass
Also my Speedport 724, which came from the A&V! (20€) has been running for almost 10 years now. And it has pretty good Wlan.12m usable, the SSID is visible at 30m, FB are far too expensive.
I wrote to you,
You could have ordered it yesterday.
I would recommend a Fritzbox. At tech savvys maybe something with OpenWRT on it.
I use a speedport smart 4 plus, all top, you don’t need a special router for it.
Right.
It should meet the requirements of the Internet provider and the management.
But no more.
I also think it should correspond to the user’s usage profile.
Absolutely!
It doesn’t have to be hopps, you can easily become part of a botnet.
Who wants to take a simple normal hopps, so please.
Hm, yes. The firmware is no longer completely up-to-date.
It’s some updates back.
But according to Changelog, did you have another update?
I don’t know.
Vulnerabilities due to Outdated Firmware makes greetings.
I mean: my router is over 10 years old xD
Do not use Wi-Fi, but a LAN cable.
Why?
The laths are usually less than 1ms for a WLAN.
The fact that WLAN is a “bottleneck” on the Internet connection is a fairy tale.
If everything is configured correctly, it’s just as fast as LAN.
If you sit next to the router and don’t want to have 5 more devices also data packets. Or if multiple-family houses emit several WLANs on the same bandwidth and interfere with each other. There are already clear restrictions. I personally sit next to my router, with me there is also only another WLAN that doesn’t run on my channel, but that certainly looks different elsewhere.
It’s not a fairy tale, it’s a reality. If you don’t happen to sit next to the router, you’ve got quite fast 4-5ms fluctuating, especially when several devices are active in the wlan. Keywords Csma/cd.
if you’re 1ms, you’re lucky, but you can’t generalize it.
Wi-Fi always has a encryption, which always costs a little time to encrypt and decrypt the data. The indication of >1ms is only a rough indication.
What generous rounding with less than one millisecond should make the one difference relevant or perceptible to the user?
It doesn’t matter what you do on the Internet