Which system camera for returning photographers?

Question

Hello community,

I had my experience with SLR cameras until about 15 years ago, when I gave up that hobby and started using only my smartphone. Now I want to get back into photography with system cameras. I've already read some good tips and recommendations in similar posts here. I've also watched a few tests and videos to get somewhat up to speed.

I want to use the camera for vacations, hikes in the mountains, or even at the seaside. At dance events, I want to take not only photos but also some videos, and possibly also at dog sports.

I think that at my current level, an entry-level camera would be sufficient. What are your opinions? Regarding lenses, the question is: original or Sigma? Do you need image stabilization in the camera?

Thank you for your answers…

sgtepic · Answer

Eos R is great. No, you don't need a picture. The original Canon lenses are good and with the R Mount not even that expensive

uneternal · Answer

Of course, depends on what you want to spend and drag. If you already have many years of experience in photography, you can get into a full format, here are cheap entry-level devices such as EOS R, EOS RP or EOS R8.

However, entry-level and middle-class cameras such as the R50, R10 or Sony A6100 or A6400 are often a bit easier to transport and do not require expensive and also heavy full-format lenses. (The R8 weighs only about 30gr more than one R10).

Canon EOS R8 from € 1254.90 (2025) | Price Comparison Geizhals Germany

Also with lenses is the question original or sigma?

Original is always better about autofocus, although I haven't had any superb experiences with Sigma yet. With current firmware, Sigma Art, Contemporary or Sport lenses focus well.

Do you need the image stabilizer in the camera?

No, especially not if you have one in the lens. The bar of Canon lenses is approximately on the same level as the sensor stabilization at Sony.

christl10 · Answer

I find you don't have to spend thousands of €. Because there are already great cameras for less than €1,000. See the Sony ZV-1 for just €599. The other day, they were offered for 529€.

ntechde · Answer

First question: Do you still have the SLR? Good lenses? Then it would be better to take a camera to which the old glasses can be adapted. Sony takes almost everything. Because the old glasses of course have no stabilization, a camera would recommend that the Stabi already bring. In exactly the situation (scraps full of Zeiss glasses) I chose a used Sony A7R2.

If that's not a topic for you, you'll be well off with the suggestions.

photon123 · Answer

h think that on my current level a starter camera would be enough. What's your opinion?

It comes to the motive first. And you don't need a lame crutch. The AF often doesn't do that well enough.

Do you need the image stabilizer in the camera?

I've never needed one. IBIS also brings something more with short focal lengths. But basically, a stabilized objective is completely sufficient because they are often good enough. I photographed with 450mm KB without problems with 1/60 from my hand, only with Stabi in the lens and usually 1/60 is even unrealistic for the motif, which is why I have to be exposed shorter. There's an additional staff in the camera 0.

schnackowitz · Answer

Thank you so much, I have now also looked at the features of R8 and R10. On the comparison page you link, you can also see the differences.

A current offer of an R10 with RF-S 18-150mm f3.5-6.3 for 1099,- I first favored what then not the so-called. Gold standard?!

uneternal · Answer

You just want to get in, you don't need the best. But you have to be aware that with such a kitzoom in bad light conditions with the ISO you have to be quite high.

schnackowitz · Answer

Yeah, that's right... I just didn't want to buy two times, so I'd rather have a nice time to live with.

uneternal · Answer

You don't really do something wrong with both cameras. Just go to the store and both take the hand.