Which sentence is grammatically and syntactically correct?
1."I believe that the young girl is the daughter of Amelie's neighbor."
2."I believe that the young girl is the daughter of Amelie's neighbor"
1."I believe that the young girl is the daughter of Amelie's neighbor."
2."I believe that the young girl is the daughter of Amelie's neighbor"
Hello, I just wanted to ask if this CV would be acceptable. Best regards and thank you in advance.
Question about: Upcoming fixed period: Interest rates will remain low for an extended period. Source: https://www.deutschplus.net/pages/Praposition_auf —- It is still clear to me why "for a longer period of time" is used here and not "for a longer period of time". Would that also be correct? " Prices will remain high for a short time."
The Council has approved a revision of the official rules and a completely new version of the official vocabulary. Our conclusion is: Internal word characters such as the underscore, the gender star, the colon, and other special characters are not part of the core of German orthography. These special characters, as meaning signals within words,…
In the Spanish exam, we have to write a text about a region. I wanted to write about why the region has a good economy, the climate, the agriculture, and the language. What else could I write? 1
"This research project, however utopian it may seem to its opponents today, will one day be realized." Hello, Is there a relative adverb in this sentence? Could you explain it? Thanks in advance…
No 2 is correct. No. 2 does not know whether it is only a male neighbour or a man and a woman.
No.1 also went if you changed the structure: “I think the young girl is the daughter of the neighbor of Amelie.”
I think “I think the young girl is the daughter of the neighbor Amelies.” would also go for No. 1, right?
Yes, that goes, but sounds very high and without context it can also mean that the neighbor is called “Amelies”.
No, the first name is not correct, at least not in modern German.
I don’t want to bite on anything. I just said,
that it is correct and “highly cooked”. Both are true,
and that was all from my side.
Then please read Duden 9, p. 366 (2, 2.1 at the bottom). It says:
“Articleless own names can also be reset to the reference word. However, this construction is almost entirely avoided with single and double-size person names.
Not: Car Ruths, trousers Karls. But possible: picture Michelangelolos, fortune Berlusconiswines France.”
If you want to bite yourself to the “almost” now, please beautiful.🤷 ♀️ I would like to point out that it is in the name Goethe one Familythe person himself is a well-known personality. But at the Beforenames of an x-customer would not be performed in modern German with genitive-s.
Otherwise, look at Duden 4, from page 211, 1.5.3.
The discussion is over. discussing facts
has no meaning. Look for the home of Goethe, for example.
Now we can “discuss” a long time ago, and in the end everyone remains in his opinion. So we prefer to make a delicious coffee and enjoy the beginning day. Good morning!
No. “The neighbor Werners” is Werner’s neighbor.
No, then it can not only mean it, but it definitely means that the neighbor carries the strange family name Amelies, that he is Mr. Amelies.
Version 2 is correct.
No 2
second
2…