Which auxiliary verb is correct?
I am confused:
- "When the clouds had cleared…"
- "When the clouds had cleared…"
- or???
I am confused:
Hi and thanks in advance to everyone who looks at my question! We currently have an extremely sexist German teacher and we are already discussing this with the school administration so that we can get a new German teacher (we are an all-girls class). He doesn't allow us to use gender, which is why in…
What would be correct here? (:
I had learned that the verb “huldigen” is always followed by the dative case. More often, however, I stumble across phrases like “I pay homage to you,” in the accusative case. Is this just a malformation that has become widespread or has there now been an adaptation so that the accusative can also be used?
Does that mean "He placed a hand on his shoulder" or "He placed a hand on his shoulder"? Thank you!
The following sentence: It all matches up and explains a lot – including the how, wherefore and why! Is this spelled correctly? Thank you in advance!
I have a strong preference for were. But as a southern country I am I also sit or sit.
What does this have to do with your property as a southern country???
I need a correct answer.
The use of auxiliary verbs they have and they were to perfection varies markedly between the north and the south of the German language space.
In southern countries, I understand people from the Mediterranean.
I don’t care about a language – this is for a literary work.
Somehow both sound stupid…
The Duden says “have”
https://www.duden.de/legislation/abregn
Both correct.
Why?
That’s it.
I actually wanted to explain the difference, but my brain doesn’t work well enough that I really could.
But the difference is small.
I think this is active, the other passive.
Then it may be. no passive but “abregnet” is used here as an adjective.
As I said, there is currently a gripal infect, not really the nerve to think about it.
… and the passive is wrong here: clouds rain; they are not sprinkled.