Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Willwissen100
2 years ago

At the latest with the end of people.

You can adjust your consumption behavior so that it is not worth keeping animals in mass for you.

Buy Demeter products.

EinAlexander
2 years ago

When does the end of mass animal husbandry come?

I hope not. Or should herd animals such as gnuantilopes, sheep, cattle and reindeer go to the area alone in the future?

What you probably mean is intensive livestock. The more people are not buying products from intensive livestock.

If the farmer sees that he can earn more money with pasture than with intensive livestock farming, he will no longer carry out intensive livestock farming.

Alex

Glocknom
2 years ago

The term mass animal husbandry is clearly defined:

Mass keeping, also called intensive animal husbandry or intensive animal husbandry, is the massive stance of animals under constrained, stressful and usually non-artificial circumstances.

Source: https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/mass conservation-99932

The reasons are likely to be clear: as much meat as possible in the shortest possible time, so that as many people as possible can satisfy their meat consumption. There is no other reason. As long as people see meat as a daily important food, there will unfortunately still be mass livestock.

DerJens292
2 years ago

There is hope for the end of the “mass farming”.

And if you make the meat for us.

And say what exactly is “mass farming “. How many pigs or cows are they going? And if it’s less, don’t you mind?

Fruchtvampir
2 years ago
Reply to  DerJens292

How many pigs or cows are they going?

I could find this here:

In order to determine any sub-limits from when a farm can be considered a mass livestock holding, a recourse to the thresholds of the Federal Construction Code, as amended in 2013 (i.e. 600 bovine animals, 560 heifers, 1,500 pigs for fattening, 15,000 laying hens or Pigs, 30,000 chickens for fattening

https://www.gruene-thl.de/massetierhaltung/fakten/was-eigenlich-massetierhaltung

DerJens292
2 years ago
Reply to  Fruchtvampir

These figures would have to be made public. For many, it begins when they cannot count the number of animals on their fingers.

SturerEsel
2 years ago

At the time when we are ready to pay for a pound of minced meat 10 euros.

This is not possible for most families.

Photon123
2 years ago
Reply to  SturerEsel

If there are still truffles in the chop and the meat is beef – beef, then I pay.

Ruenbezahl
2 years ago

The end of mass animal husbandry is likely to coincide with the end of mass human attitude.

AriZona04
2 years ago

As long as you can earn money with it – or ONLY with it – this will remain the same. The times when meat was rar are over and “man” has become used to it.

14Alberich18
2 years ago

Never.

It will become more and no less because the demand for affordable FLEISCH remains the same.

FLEISCH is one of the basic foods.

Hufpfote
2 years ago

I’m not afraid. Especially as a result of the rising costs, it is impossible to afford anyone else.

StRiW
2 years ago

As long as the customer is not willing to adequately remunerate the use of a farmer’s capital.

CleverRemo
2 years ago

This will never happen because the meat requirement is too high.

Negro975
2 years ago

Never because people are hungry

wandaonline
2 years ago

not because people need to be fed