What would you rather ban for the environment?

I’m sure. Bullfights or horse races are not harmful to the environment. In the first five or six years of their lives, these bulls have a much more free and beautiful life than our mass animals. Beautiful landscapes are also preserved. I don’t think the fights are good either. If I would rather pay to see the bulls in their habitats, however, you would have to regulate there somehow.

Motorsport is of course not good for the environment but zb you should also forbid to get a new phone every 2 years, buy too often new clothes, palm oil and aluminum in many products and you should eat less meat.

Zb brings together the textile industry more than co 2 than ships and air traffic and unexplainedly directs wastewater into the rivers. For mobile radio raw materials rainforest is cleared in large style also for food cultivation and palm oil. For peat in the garden soil moore are destroyed which are important for climate and environment. Rainforest is also cleared for grilled charcoal.

Commercial candles produce more fine dust than the industry because they consist mainly of paraffin, a petroleum waste material and the flame does not burn hot enough to burn everything properly.

One would have to ban silicones in cosmetics and much more or at least reduce it all.

But many things will never be said in politics, etc., all that the economy is running and that brings more money and the environment is often secondary.

Many construction projects also need to be prevented, zb have even in Germany rare animals or plants yet no construction project really prevented even if unique habitats are to be added. Animals are relocated in the long term but no solution is eventually occupied by areas. In economic interests, the environment is also of secondary importance to us.