Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Aylamanolo
1 year ago

what has a filming to do with a good book? There are many books in world literature that have never been filmed. And when, most of them are arthouse films and not blockbusters. The film “The English Patient” is based on the homonymous novel, but only treats at most the middle 20 pages of the entire book, which is actually unfilmable.

A good author is the one who has an interesting and profound subject and also writes very well in style. But this has not much to do with success, I do not think that a Mr. Reich Ranitzki would have appreciated the Harry Potter novels even one glance. They are very entertaining, I liked to read them, but literature in the narrower sense they are not.

Otherwise: I once read that a bad style is characterized by the use of very many superfluous adjectives. And that’s true. I thought, “Lance raised his black hair before anger.” The adjective black is completely superfluous here.

tinalisatina
1 year ago

If you look at what besch*** books are filmed (or just published in a publisher), then you can see that there is no general criterion. More information

  • Contacts to relevant people
  • the chance that the film is successful, i.e. a mainstream story that is not too complicated and is being discussed accurately
Nuha974
1 year ago

In my opinion, bad books are often filmed, I think you just have to write something that many people are interested in, with figures you can put yourself in, it must have a good storyline and be liquid to read

sonderdings
1 year ago

I would have said now that the qualities “right good book” and “filmed” do not necessarily have anything to do with each other.

marie07834
1 year ago

The book of him must be convincing.