What is the truth behind the cholesterol myth about eggs?
Do eggs significantly raise cholesterol? Eat up to 20 eggs a week
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Rooster or hen quail?
Is this quail a rooster?
Which fast food is the healthiest?
Healthy, of course, in quotation marks. Do you prefer kebabs because of the salad, pizza because of the tomato sauce and dough, or something completely different? I like eating fast food, so I'd be interested to hear what you think about it.
Suddenly different appetite?
Normally I really like eating vegetables and don't like sweet things. A few weeks ago, I started adding things like broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and white cabbage, which I rarely ate before. At first I thought it was nice to eat more different vegetables, but suddenly I have little to no desire for vegetables and really…
Do diet drinks increase insulin levels?
Hello, I'm wondering if diet drinks raise insulin levels. If they do, that's not good at all.
Eggs contain approx. 0.4g of cholesterol per 100g … at 20 eggs per vat are about 3 per day. An egg weighs approx. 60-70g … so let’s say 70g x 3 = 210g … times the 0.4g/100g yields about 0.8g/day.
That the body is causing cholesterol self-synthesis when cholesterol is absorbed by food is correct. We need approx. 1.5-2g cholesterol… so the 3 eggs a day should not be a problem. Only if you are more than approx. 7 eggs a day, so you are simply exceeding the amount of cholesterol you take on food compared to your own synthesis.
However, the cholesterol level can nevertheless rise as meat, sausage, fish, milk and milk products also contain cholesterol. Also saturated fats and trans fats allow the cholesterol level to rise …
Here I summarized everything and explained:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRbsF3fQiy8
Hardly a food contains so much cholesterol as eggs.
But the body independently regulates the Chölesterine level as long as it is healthy.
However, those who suffer from diabetes II, damage to the kidneys or liver should be careful. Every day 4-5 eggs are plenty. Reduction would be useful.
Effects of dietary cholesterol on serum cholesterol: a meta-analysis and review
1992: The serum cholesterol concentration is significantly increased by additional cholesterol from food, but the extent of the increase is influenced by the starting cholesterol from food. Very good graphics: Figure 2: “Effects of additional cholesterol in food to the total cholesterol in serum. In nonlinear regression, both the starting value and the additional cholesterol are taken into account in food. In the case of a moderate cholesterol feed via food, only a slight additional change in serum cholesterol is to be expected.” If the total cholesterol in the serum is close to 0 mg/dl, the strongest reaction to the serum cholesterol is to be expected by additional dietary cholesterol. If the total cholesterol in the serum is, for example, 500 mg/dl, no or only a slight measurable change is to be expected. Only slight changes in serum cholesterol are to be expected, even if large amounts of cholesterol are added, for persons who in any case have relatively high cholesterol levels and have a high cholesterol level (dangerous).
So yes, eggs increase the cholesterol level, just like all animal products, and that cholesterol is the causal cause of arteriosclerosis and caused cardiovascular diseases I had shown with many studies.
A long refuted myth!
My study refuted the myth.
I had explained and refuted the propaganda of the egg industry in several comments, including the false statements about Ancel Keys and the seven-country study. Can you comment on it in terms of content?
Eggs increase cholesterol levels. Cholesterol is the causal cause of arteriosclerosis.
.
What do you dream about at night?
Show me the places where my statements were allegedly refuted. With explanation and sources, please.
You didn’t refute anything. In the You refutes, in fact, in detail and with many evidence, sources and studies.
NO❗️
NO❗️
Bullshit
No!
Subsidiary
No, you just figure that a❗️
NO, neither…
No, you didn’t refute anything
FALSCH + RECOMMENDS
Your statements are not correct, but wrong.
Nonsense! Your false statements have been repeatedly refuted!
Subsidiary
Here too you move in criminal law!
A criminal act according to §186 and §187, StGB, üble Nachrede und Verleumdung!
You know that your claims are freely invented and lies.
Make yourself a public debate.
Unstoppable false statements without justification or evidence. You are spreading misinformation, propaganda, committing logical misconducts, cannot enter into any content. You were completely taken apart from me.
So, can you formulate a content argument?
And again, you have reached with your false claims in criminal law!
A criminal act according to §186 and §187, StGB, üble Nachrede und Verleumdung!
You know that your claims are freely invented and lies.
Your false statements were all refuted with detailed explanations and a great deal of studies. At the same time, I could point out what logical failures are based on your weak arguments. You can’t talk about anything.
We won’t start from the front.
Your false statements were all disproved.
A content admission is sufficient!
Let it be both your disinformation, your insults and once more your criminal statements!
I know that my statements are in fact correct and inconsistent, so their content does not depend on them.
A criminal act according to §186 and §187, StGB, üble Nachrede und Verleumdung!
You know that your claims are freely invented and lies.
If you have understood this, why do you constantly tell such nonsense and spread false information, with old, long-refused studies and stubborn, human-exciting ideologies?
Let it be both your disinformation, your insults and once more your criminal statements!
That’s not how a debate works. You’re proving misinformation and propaganda, not me.
I had even looked at the propaganda Doku to cholesterol from you and dealt with it in terms of content and refusing the Doku.
You don’t care about anything.
Can you formulate a content argument?
“dodging in the context of discussions, debates or interviews a tactics in which someone deliberately avoids a question, a subject or a challenge. Instead of responding directly to the question raised or dealing with the subject raised, the person deviates to another topic, gives a evasive answer or directs attention to something else.
In rhetoric and in assessing arguments, dodging is often considered to be a weakness, as it shows that the person is not willing or able to deal directly with the topics addressed.”
I’m logically inconsistent, only you’re making logical mistakes.
Can you formulate a content argument?
And no content criticism again.
“The truth runs through three phases: First it becomes mocked. After that, you are violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
Appeal to Incredulity Fallacy
Information is rejected from a limited, incomplete or incorrect understanding: “I don’t think X can be true, so X must be wrong.”
Appeal to Stone Fallacy
Person A (I) claims something. Person B rejects the claim. Person A asks the rejection. Person B gives no evidence or justification.
Exactly… I don’t want to deal with your stupid bullshit and your false statements today… ️A discussion is not possible with you anyway, as you can only get the same copied, hollow phrases out, because you don’t have any knowledge and competence about the topics.
You just want to spread your radical Vegan Propaganda + fat hysteria including false information about the causes of diabetes and other diseases, otherwise nix❗️
“dodging in the context of discussions, debates or interviews a tactics in which someone deliberately avoids a question, a subject or a challenge. Instead of responding directly to the question raised or dealing with the subject raised, the person deviates to another topic, gives a evasive answer or directs attention to something else.
In rhetoric and in assessing arguments, dodging is often considered to be a weakness, as it shows that the person is not willing or able to deal directly with the topics addressed.”
Can you formulate a content argument?
👉🚮🚮🚮🚮🚮🚮🚮
And no content criticism again.
“The truth runs through three phases: First it becomes mocked. After that, you are violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
Appeal to Incredulity Fallacy
Information is rejected from a limited, incomplete or incorrect understanding: “I don’t think X can be true, so X must be wrong.”
Appeal to Stone Fallacy
Person A (I) claims something. Person B rejects the claim. Person A asks the rejection. Person B gives no evidence or justification.
Can you formulate a content argument?
Your incompetent
Vegan Propaganda Studies and Videos
including all your false statements
you can all knock in the ton! 🚮
Can you formulate a content argument?
Obviously, you don’t seem to understand it or not even want to understand that all your claims are failures!
Uralte, long ago refuted claims to spread… naja
No❗️
Look here:
https://archive.org/daten/cholesterin-der-grosse-bluff-arte-doku-till-eule
Nothing was disproved. I had completely refuted your false statements in more than 5 comments full of studies, even more recent studies. It is scientifically causal and is considered a scientific consensus. I also objected to the false statement about Ancel Keys.
Do you understand why an argument based on a logical failure is invalid?
Can you formulate a content argument?
Oh, now you want to have your own studies.
Your 32-year-old stories were dubiously refuted a long time ago.
This has been redesigned according to the Internet. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle and as always applies, the amount makes the poison. I like to eat eggs and don’t worry about it.
Hello Maggusfan, 👋
Not at all.
No!
https://www.focus.de/health/videos/gar-non-schaedlich-die-cholesterin-luege-warum-sie-ruhig-fleisch-eier-und-butter-essennen_id_4707303.html
https://archive.org/daten/cholesterin-der-grosse-bluff-arte-doku-till-eule
♪
LG 🙋🏻
No. Food / food affects cholesterol levels by only 15%.