What is the grammatical error?
Cartoon interpretation of "Socialist in the Box"
What is the grammatical error in this ZU ?
Cartoon interpretation of "Socialist in the Box"
What is the grammatical error in this ZU ?
Hey guys, I have a question. In Germany you often hear the expression “n3al tabon yemek” or something like that. can someone translate this?
When I used to ALWAYS be … (e.g. student) I am …..
Hello, how does the word order work in a subordinate clause with four verbs? (…hat gehen lassen wollen)? One more question with a subordinate clause, just to be sure 🙂 Preterite : he said that he didn't want to let us go (He said that he didn't want to let us go) The question is,…
Most Germans like…
What is the essential difference between seeing and looking? When is (looking) needed in everyday life? When is (seeing) needed in everyday life?
♪
writing, it’s wurscht. Grammar are all these variants in order. Here you see my ranking. Someone else might see number 2 more fitting. It’s no. 4.
Ask the stooler why he’s hitting the “too”.
Maybe that the critic a bit to is pingelic; everyone understands of what is said here, except perhaps for people who from and to on and off.
“to” is not really wrong, but “of” the better choice.
In this context, “of” are used to make it clear that this is an interpretation that describes or analyzes the cartoon. So correct would be: “Caricature interpretation of ‘Socialist in the Box’.
There is no one.