The state is abolishing tickets for public transport—you no longer have to pay for buses, trams, and trains. However, the state is introducing a kind of "public transport tax."
(1 votes)
Loading...Try some lousy brainstorming. It's for a discussion group! I'd love your answers.🙏🏼
Which vehicles are normally used on the tram in Schöneiche (line 88)?
There is currently a debate about whether Sunday should be abolished and become a normal shopping day without bonuses, like public holidays, and whether employees in retail should be allowed to work 4-12 hours without additional pay. This is intended to be a measure against insolvencies and increasing sales in online retail. How do you…
My flight departs from Düsseldorf Airport at 7:45 PM. I'm departing from Ibbenbüren and need to take the train to Düsseldorf Airport: Connection on Mon. 27.05.2024 • from Ibbenbüren , departure 14:54 Gl. 1 with WFB95783 • to Düsseldorf Airport , arrival 17:31 Gl. 4 with RE 26826 View connection: https://www.bahn.de/buchung/start?vbid=614f09c7-63c9-4740-93f4-93a9289790be Do I need to…
Hey guys I'm considering studying computer science at LMU. LMU is the only university in Germany that I know of that offers computer science as a minor. I have a very broad range of interests. Therefore, I might want to minor in politics or linguistics, as those are also areas that interest me greatly. My…
Well, I definitely know about 100 people who have been smoking for years and haven't gotten anything done, even people who have lost their personality because of it. Personally, I have tried it sometimes with friends, but sometimes it was a bad experience and I suddenly felt really sad, cried, felt uncomfortable and had a…
Who should pay the taxes? How? As a package? Not everyone rides with ÖPNV and even if, everyone has a different length or only drives once a week.
Just as forced labour as broadcasting fees .
Thanks for the star 🙂
Die Frage kann ich nicht mit einem klaren ja oder nein beantworten.
Dazu müssten erst einmal klare Mindestanforderungen an den öffentlichen Verkehr definiert und dessen Finanzierung geregelt und gesichert sein, denn es nützt mir als Fahrgast nicht viel, wenn die Busse zwar kostenlos benutzt werden können, aber abends oder am Wochenende kein Bus mehr fährt, weil das Geld fehlt und mal wieder gespart werden muss.
Als zahlender Kunde, der bei einem schlechteren Angebot keine Fahrscheine mehr kauft oder sein Abo kündigt, sehe ich mich in einer besseren Position, als wenn ich nur ein Nutzer eines kostenlosen Angebotes bin, bei dem es dem Betreiber egal sein kann, ob ich es nutze oder nicht.
Außerdem dürfte eine solche “ÖPNV-Steuer” in weiten Teilen der Bevölkerung eine ähnliche Beliebtheit entwickeln, wie heute beispielsweise der Rundfunkbeitrag.
I’m ONLY for getting bus and train connections in the country that allow you to go to work, shopping and to the doctor to the city. This is not the case at all. Practically, the few buses are used here only by pupils because they do not fit to the usual working hours and because you would have to wait forever for the return journey or no longer come home in the evening.
I do not pay tax for the previous system of the PNV which is not available with us. I can’t use it!
To this end, I think that the bus traffic in the resin – as an example I know – is going super good. All right: I don’t know if you can use it when you work – added. But as a tourist this is great: the bus runs a few times a day, is on time(!) and inexpensive. I think. It’s as good as no one does. You just have to offer a service. And I think that’s great – as a tourist.
Would only make sense if something like ÖPNV
1) would be available everywhere.
2) would be available in a way that can also be usefully used.
free ÖPNV has long been a topic of discussion. One of the few sensible climate protection measures in the long term.
great for the inhabitants of the country……
where on day 4x the bus stops (and then he stops damn often)
Moin,
these Contribution is at least in the heading for a part of my opinion on the subject!
I don’t want to spend 90% of my free time in traffic (no matter which one!) In any case in rural regions, the PNV is slow, with great time intervals, difficult to achieve and often not targeted!
I’m already financing him with taxes! (Or believes one that drives a bus for 2€*10 passengers)
Free ÖPNV could be imagined because administrative costs are also saved in the long term! But a special tax… no thanks.
In addition, ÖPNV is a county case and each county would have to find regulations! …
Greetings
Die Frage ist … wer soll das bezahlen? Und wie soll der öpnv die zusätzlichen Fahrgäste verkraften wenn schon heute die Züge zur rushour überfüllt sind.
Also .. erst müsste man den Nahverkehr ausbauen, mehr Züge längere Betriebszeiten.. saubere Bahnhöfe… und dann müsste man entscheiden wer es bezahlt? Die Autofahrer ? Steuerzahler allgemein? Schulden der Städte ?
Would it not be more sensible to make the tariffs of transport networks more attractive and to put more on, for example, annual tickets? Likewise, municipalities, if possible, should allow a grant to certain groups of persons (teachers, students, etc.).
In this way everyone can decide for themselves what ticket and what Öffi you want to use.
No one really wants to pay more taxes. Not in today’s time when living is already overpriced! There are regions with a very poor Öffi offer. So should some people pay taxes for something they can’t use?
Hope you can start with my answer!
Greeting!
If this tax flows completely into public transport and the further operational planning would remain to the citizens.
As soon as money lands in public cash, the Asgeiers get out of politics. You have to consider it systemically.
OPNV but without tax…
The tickets are purchased as usual…
We already pay for the ÖPNV or did you think he was wearing himself through the ticket sales? He’s already heavily suspiced.
Very good idea, ÖPNV should be paid from tax funds. Lithuania is making progress. No new idea, they had shon others by the way.
That would have solved the homeless problem. What doesn’t cost is not appreciated either.
Then the quality of the train companies continues to decrease.
It’s unfair. Should everyone continue to pay what he uses.
und die, die nie mit dem ÖPV fahren, zahlen für nichts!
You’re definitely right!
There are, especially in rural areas, some regions where the Öffinetz is very poor. Here in the deepest Alps there are areas where you are already happy to see some bus.
So you would pay for some taxes, which you cannot use yourself.
Schmunzel……And who should pay the ÖPNV tax?
Everyone, like the radio fees.
viel Spaß vorm Bundesverfassungsgericht.
würde keinen Bestand haben
This question is a theoretical question anyway, and logically it would be necessary to extend the offer.
as I said, a lot of fun before BVerG.
How to get to Geier do you want to compare a free ÖPNV with radio fees? with us at the place except the school bus only one call bus!
and for this bullshit I don’t pay GARANTIERT any more taxes!
Why not, it is quite possible to compare with radio fees and they also have stock.
Either way. You should’ve done it.
Ne, then I have to pay for Harzer, ne thank you
Then the package which is intended for transport would be depreciating but shortened.
Harzer steht für:
Harzer – Wikipedia
???🤔
Can be tapped from the context.