What do you think of these boring history texts?
Gentlemen, the item on today's agenda has often been described as the keystone of the German constitution; even the committee's report states that it is the pinnacle of the German constitution. […] I would like to draw your attention to the significance of today's social movement. Remember that our movement was also largely based on the assumption that the people are materially miserable. It was not about creating mere political forms in the present. You must all be convinced that only when the people can live materially contentedly will any form of government have any basis. And now I ask, if you have placed the imperial luxury at the head of the state, will it not be imitated from top to bottom, down to the smallest prince? People have complained about the princes' extravagance; what will it be like when the lesser princes want to imitate the emperor! We retain our endless expenditures for standing armies, for the entire civil service, in short, all the burdens that the old system had. These are increased by the Empire, and material prosperity cannot be promoted. […] Gentlemen! Do not place an emperor at the head of Germany […], you will remain halfway through the movement and you will build a structure that will very soon be torn down by the ongoing movement of the times. (Applause from the Left.)
This boring historical text has made me curious, I might read a few more things from the Paulskirchen assembly protocols.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Jo likes to send more
Not necessary, I found the source online. But thank you!
Wonderful
Sounds like a parliamentary speech by a (presumably) social-democratic MEP, who could have kept it around 1871. August Bebel would be a potential candidate… but that’s just guessed. But could also be a speech from the time of the revolution of 1848/49; held in the Frankfurter Paulskirche …
In principle, I like it better than the majority of today’s parliamentary speeches; Finally, we know what and what the spokesman for (at the time there were no women as voting members in Parliament; they had neither active nor passive voting rights). With current speeches in the Bundestag, it is often enough to recognize the meaning of a contribution.
I checked. It’s from the Paulskirche. Friedrich J. Schütz.
I had a suspicion of the Weimar Constitutional Assembly first, but that didn’t fit so completely…
Nope, it wasn’t Bebel who was at the time when the speech was held just 9 years old 🙂
https://segu-geschichte.de/Kaiser-praesident-quellen/
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Jacob_Sch%C3%BCtz
It’s just a sworm from that time. There’s one thing that has turned out to be very good. Well.
But youth language is not everyone’s thing.
Thank you
I like the old language.