What do you think of such advertisements?
I find such oversexualized advertisements really annoying.
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Would you like to be immortal?
There is probably a lot to consider.
Why are so many young, pretty people depressed?
ByBettruhe
But especially women? We're talking about people aged 14-21.
What kind of phenomenon is this?
In everyday life, things often happen to me and I realize that I have dreamed about this exact situation before. Example: I'm talking to a colleague at work about topic XY, completely irrelevant stuff. At this moment during the conversation, I realize that I had this conversation in a dream 3-4 days ago, exactly as…
Feeling like you've experienced something before?
Hello, I was just somewhere and then I looked around, and then all of a sudden I recognized this place because I (supposedly) had a dream about it recently. It was really weird, and it happens to me often. Does anyone know what this is, have you experienced it too, and is it actually something…
How can one save one's life in this condition?
ByWiseBoy
I basically sit in my room in front of a screen all day, or at least I don't do anything productive. I only have one friend who almost never goes out. I have someone else in my class, but I talk to him during recess and group work, but we never meet up. Otherwise, I'm…
This is not advertising, but the cover of a book….
I suspect that the book is about sexuality.
Okay, that could be advertised differently.
Actually, I don’t care, but in case of doubt, I wouldn’t be hiding esthetic opponents. I find sexualized advertising as long as OK as it does not prejudge traditional gender roles.
And I find this whole muffle-damaged hiding of sexuality rather negative.
Otherwise, the cover fits exactly to the book: https://www.amazon.de/Rainz-Spanish-Helix-John-Christopher/dp/1491748257
What is aesthetic about it? This is just softporno to attract attention to advertising.
Is there too in unaesthetic 😎. I find these representations no matter how pretty/sounding. Every return to the imprisoned morality of my youth or the US standard I completely reject…
I also reject cerebelliousness, but I believe that any form of sexuality is a private thing that has nothing to look for in the public, unless it is enlightenment. I’m also for a final criminalization of incest. I’m not jammed or similar.
I don’t think there’s anything in it, it’s aesthetic. Worse incentives at most solve these cheap and primitive “root me on” advertising spots on television, but they have, fortunately, taken very seriously in recent years.
Well, advertising is always annoying me, but that makes advertising at least something more bearable
I find such half porn to spread really unnecessary. I have nothing against porn, I keep looking at this, but I find sexual acts should be a private matter and not be spread to the public all the time.
There are no sexual acts in the public with a cover. Especially since they only embrace upper body free on the cover and even cover the breasts.
So, it’s not a cheat when you put a woman on the breasts and pants?
Of course, it is a sexual act. What is the meaning of this if not sexual arousal?
There’s no one getting busted on the picture. There is always one hand on the abdomen and the other hands cover the chest. I’ve never said that it wasn’t sexual, but it’s just not sexual acts. Just because the hands are only there and nothing else is done on the cover. And that’s advertising, too, I’m aware.
There are two half-naked people who do not describe as sexually wrong. This cover also serves as advertising.
Surpluses