What can the company sue for if you worked a part-time job while you were sick in your main job and sometimes both jobs overlap?
Both jobs are in a call center and a home office (this has now come to light). What can the company sue for, and what can happen to me? (I recognize that this was wrong and accept responsibility). I'm currently waiting for a call back from my lawyers and wanted to find out in advance.
In other words, you work in the main job during working hours, for your side job.
So beware your employer.
No lawyer will be able to help you. This is followed by a termination.
You’re not loyal to your company and you can use the knowledge at the side job. In addition, I know there is a ban that you should not do the same job as the main job at the side job. If you learn mason, you may be a side job delivery service driver, but not a mason. You also violated the medical prescription. You can hang the main job on the nail. He’s gone. In addition, damages can also come to you.
They have already retained my wages and the wage is higher than the resulting damage. What do they want to complain or show?
He… Your reward doesn’t even cover it almost. In such a case, damages can go into the thousands. Depending on the industry, the violation of data protection can also be added.
This is wrong
To illustrate this for me, you’ve let yourself write sick so you can work undisturbed in another job?
There, the main employer in which you reported as temporarily incapable of work does not have to raise any complaint. He’ll give you the time to do your second job more intensively, through a timeless termination.
You’re doing a nice job on “thick pants”. Your lawyers? You hired more than one? Respect!
This is fraud and can therefore be prosecuted.
In addition, the company will demand the continued payment of the fee. An additional claim for damages would also be conceivable, but will generally be difficult to enforce.
They have already retained the wages and wages are higher than a result. Why would they sue or show? I called there to get out of the good again, maybe it’s gonna do something else.
But certainly only for the last month.
There will be even more demands for repayment of wages if you are known since when you have your side job.
It’s not allowed. Unfortunately, there’s no lawyer here to help you.
You are incapable of work, then you don’t work AUCH in the side job, or you’re incapable of work and create in both jobs.
Exception: If one of the two jobs can’t be done for illness, but the other. It happened to me last year: ankle wounded and giped…in the side job (time delivery) I was written. In the main job (office office) I worked… because the plaster on the leg did not prevent me from working on the PC processes.
You’ve been canceled in no time. As you can prove that you have BETROGEN with regard to the AU, you will be asked to return the already paid wage (repayable pay). And the cost of re-ordering your job is required (theoretically) as compensation…
If the side job boss gets something from this thing, you’ll be put in the door. They’ll find a reason to cancel…
They have already retained my wages (living is higher than a resultant damage). I called and apologise, and I’m trying to get out in the good without complaint and ad. Why should they sue if they’re already keeping the pay?
If you were cheating, would you be satisfied with the refund of the accrued amount, or would you not have an interest in punishing the Taeter?
A “Sorry” isn’t enough. Companies respond to fraud from their employees extremely sensitive…to the ad you won’t come around.
No, that doesn’t mean it. They don’t want to have you in their rooms anymore or on their servers (Homeoffice), so you’re free.
They won’t tell you if they show you. Again, the lawsuit is not brought by the company, but by the prosecutor’s office, if there is evidence of fraud.
I was on the phone with the company the other day, and they only meant that they were preparing the termination. I meant that I would like to get out in a good way so that the case is quickly completed, then the company says that I am released until the termination starts. There was no mention of ad or action. That means there’s nothing in the room or not?
In addition to Caveman: your ex-mates don’t even get stupid thoughts, you’ll see. “Klagen” then does the prosecutor’s office. The fraud is basically a so-called official offence. This means that such a criminal offence is prosecuted by the prosecution authority (public prosecutor’s office) in case of acquiring knowledge.
Why would they tell me when they’re keeping my wages and the thing is resolved with the termination?
You have a ban on competition under GARANTIE. And if that’s noticed, you’ll probably expect a timeless termination. Even claims for damages.
My wages have already been retained and harm is lower than my wages. Would they just show them logically or raise complaints?
An ad goes to the void. You didn’t violate a law. You can’t even judge how high a claim for damages is.
If the lawsuit or ad were to be in the room, they would say it directly. Why would you make a secret?
You don’t use anything like I guess.
How would they assess that?
You just have to wait
I talked to the company the other day and I said I wanted to get out of the good and take responsibility and apologize. The company meant that I was released until the termination is over and that I would receive money if they were to charge that too much. No mention was made of advert and complaint. Does it look like you’re even with keeping the money?
Of course, you can see yourself for fraud. But companies do that rather rarely. But that can happen if you want to complain about a termination.
This means that I will not receive a complaint or complaint, among other things, they have retained my wages and check whether it is too much or not. How would they judge that?
She won’t pay you any wages for the bad days because you obviously were not incapable of work. And she’ll at least give you a fat warning.
I’ve been canceled. Can they sue me and show me?
Of course they can show you. Fraud is criminal.
Depends on the past. Probably only a fine.
More details here: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__263.html
What consequences would this threaten me?
As I said, the criminal prosecution ( criminal proceedings for fraud) has nothing to do with civil law (replacement of the accrued amount). It was an attempt to deceive and if the prosecuting prosecutor heard of it, he will probably also initiate proceedings.
Can they still prosecute this? I don’t see a reason why they’re keeping the pay.
The maintenance of wages has nothing to do with the criminal prosecution of fraud.
They have already retained the wages should not be enough in the case?