What's the point of these "let me have it" caps on PET bottles if they're more of an annoyance when drinking from the bottle and can be irritated?
Once torn off, the bottle is easier to drink from and close again, and the lids can then be left lying around again…
It is also a new EU directive, until July of this year all bottles must have such a lid and I can also understand it.
Where I ask myself who puts a bottle without a lid, I mean why to throw away the lid, which is to screw on the bottle takes 2 seconds, that is now truly no piece of art, honestly I always do it because the bottle is also annoying and with the small bottles for drinking it just are in the way, but it is more likely that there should be a law for it, it can never really be my lid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTTQgecl5lk
It is absolutely irrelevant how much I like your answer (or the reason for this cover…) or fails. But your answer is clearly the best… thanks.
It was apparently a good idea (which the “inventor” probably also had a lot of money), but the implementation is rather lacking.
In most cases one has the greatest problems in drinking or pouring out into the glass. Similarly, it is much more difficult to get the lid back on it. Probably, most of them tear off the lid so that the bottle is better to hang. The reason is that the bottle with the lid is delivered, which basically makes sense.
However, it would be really interesting to know now whether there are actually more lids in return. There are even annoyed people who deliberately dispose of the lid… I’m also sure that most bottles were released with lid before…
My children sometimes have trouble screwing the lid when it’s on. That’s why I sometimes have to take him off for them, because sometimes they can’t.
Because of the ban on the lid, we already had the one or the other lid constriction, with dumped drinks.
This is the real problem, in principle a good idea, but one can hardly imagine that it was properly tested in practice. Not only children have their problems with the crap…
Jaaa, and the yellow sack you can also tear up and spread the content on the street.
You can do a lot, but you can’t.
If the lid flips well, it doesn’t bother.
The yellow sack “better” can be used to facilitate work during waste disposal for waste separation. If such an employee:in the day (let’s say) 100-150 bags will be irritated to him/her in the evening probably always-but the hands hurt…
You don’t have to do everything just because it’s possible
You have to raise the difference and still learn. 😁😁😁😁😁🤦
I was smart. Originally, it was generally recommended to close beverage cartons so that the sensors of the recycling plants do not make a wrong assignment. We also made decades hard. With the result that the closures now pollute nature and the seas without being able to get them big.
Now, the EU’s recommendation is to make the closures firmly to the bags for these reasons. In the case of the milk of DM, they are attached sideways. You can get shut up. But you can also turn the closure upwards. Then it’s better.
I’m often in Poland. As students collect the closures and get money from recycling for school.
The point is that the lids are delivered with the bottles.
But I find that really ineffective, I also disturb the picking lid, I cut it off with the side cutter.
In the same way, I do it – a real annoyance that once again serves the “education” of customers…
Yeah, a smuggling improvement, as it stands in the beech.
That they’re letting them go and that’s not going around loosely.
It’s about environmental protection. I just find them bothersome and didn’t just get them in nature. I was wondering what to do?
Me neither. This is for me the most important advantage of PET bottles compared to glass bottles (which they are re-closable) It/she “stinct/(s)” not…
it doesn’t make sense. Take it off and it’s good…
Simple answer – To get the population into trouble and to ****.