Wer hat Argumente gegen meine Meinung “SCRUM ist für Teams, in denen kaum jemand versteht, auch selbstständig sinnvoll zu arbeiten”?

|

SCRUM verstanden, wie hier beschrieben:

https://digitaleneuordnung.de/blog/scrum-methode/

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
W00dp3ckr
9 months ago

Scrum or at least practices can be introduced and brought a lot. Scrum is for teams that have a certain size, where you don’t get blind anymore.

It is problematic that frequently essential parts are omitted without at least imaging their idea. So, for example, the separation of product Owner and other roles. Or that the developers 👨 💻 themselves should appreciate how long they need for a task.

On the contrary, Scrum requires self-motivated, good team players.

W00dp3ckr
9 months ago
Reply to  grtgrt

At work?

by the way, everything is printed in bold. Somewhat uncomfortable, you feel cried. But they can continue to discuss with people who want to evaluate others.

cleanercode
9 months ago

The blog post itself is good. Only that there are no meetings in Scrum, but events. And the refinement itself is not an independent event. But otherwise you can use the blog for further education.

Scrum IST for teams working independently. “Cross-functional” and “self-managing” are the keywords here. A lot of emphasis is placed on communication and respect, so that a team is actually a team – and not a group.

W00dp3ckr
9 months ago
Reply to  cleanercode

Yes, people who can enjoy and want to achieve something together. With people who don’t play with it, it’ll be difficult.

cleanercode
9 months ago
Reply to  W00dp3ckr

I cannot leave more than one <3 for this statement :)

TheQ86
9 months ago

I know NIEMANDEN who’s making a mess.

Hold periodic meetings and make the same as always is not agile.

And people don’t understand. Either I do it as it is in the agile manifesto, or I don’t make a scrum. Then, of course, I can’t draw any benefits from it.

In addition, Scrum is not an all-healing agent even if you pass it “perfect”. It does not fit all situations and “automatically better” becomes nix.

smiregal8472
9 months ago

Here!

Simple:

SCRUM has nothing to do with whether anyone is able to work independently or not.

SCRUM and the whole other agile rubbish only have something to do with the fact that incapable stupid idiots pull out side-by-side text from the butt, whose real content can be summarized in 0 letters.

The whole garbage is nothing more than a stupid bunch of buzzwords mixed with hollow filling phrases and then so re-formulated that it sounds halfway pretty.

ntechde
9 months ago

May I allow myself to reply without reading the text?

How did you actually make programming?

  • For Apollo 11?
  • For Voyager 1/2?
  • For Spacelab and ISS?
  • For the million lines Cobol of the German Bank and Volkswagen?
  • For the kernel of Linux?

And who wants more example, ask!

And all this without Scrum and Agility!

If I am able to inspire a team (no matter how big) and make it possible that ALL will find themselves behind the goal and put their own line back and push the “friend” rather than themselves, then the “meetings and events” take place with a cup of coffee or a cigarette!

Do you want me to say that Scrum and Co. are for incapable or unfavourable teams?

No, I’m not that bad!

jort93
9 months ago

I think that’s true.

But why is that supposed to be bad? It’s good that that’s stupid.

But, really strictly, no one actually pulls through, at least never seen.