Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
17 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
EarthCitizen20
2 years ago

Hello mikbau,

for this, the company has built an extra drawer – and often speaks of an “Ödipus complex”, the subject thus also a piece of far-moving.

We people have some features. Thus, a certain proximity to a human being can quickly let a unity with the human being become aware. Depending on the individual perception, there is more or less a focus or an intensity in it.

For example, if we are inclined towards people, such proximity may “ignite” feelings. We feel this moment in love. In doing so, we may consider love as the moment of perception of unity – and the feelings are expression of it in us.

Between parents and children – and here we take daughter and father as an example – “humanize” it: archaic would serve near to inclined people rather for reproduction; but this is more dampened here, where it was about almost the same genes. Thus, we observe a restricted proximity between the people, which would not “ignite” in this damping.

However, this damping may not be very pronounced individually. Then “ignite” the feelings – and much more closeness than the society may be allowed to arise.

If it burns more in the daughter than in the father, perhaps the father would be surprised by this proximity. But he can perceive them, at least offer a little more closeness than he would have offered, so that the daughter also understands in their feelings. It may be such a very good friendship – and parents and children must always be very good friends with each other.

A swarm may be the expression of these feelings – and then the unity must always be conscious as the certain more. And in unity there are neither expectations nor any own needs in which someone would use the other person.

Best regards
EarthCitizen

EarthCitizen20
2 years ago
Reply to  EarthCitizen20

Hello mikbau,

thank you very much for the star. I’m very happy to help you.

Best regards
EarthCitizen

cas65
2 years ago
Reply to  EarthCitizen20

Nice answer. To perfection only that: As an Ödipus complex, C.G. Jung describes the relationship between son and mother. The daughter-father ratio is called Elektra complex.

Takumi2007
2 years ago
Reply to  cas65

Are there any still missing 2 constellations (son and father, as well as daughter and mother) drawers?

EarthCitizen20
2 years ago
Reply to  cas65

And I think these complexes are flat-rate for an anachonism – and, if necessary, only when there is a situation of suffering in space.

cas65
2 years ago

These “Schubladen” tribes from the time of C.G. Jung. Other constellations will have been so rare at his time that they have not played any role for him. And even today, it is the norm that people stand on the ANDERE gender. And no, Jung wasn’t primarily about reproductive possibilities. This approach is also about how partner preferences emerge. And so the theory is that adults sometimes choose partners that resemble the other gender parent in any way. I can at least confirm this from my point of view. My mother was a petty little woman. And I also prefer this guy. But that does not mean that this applies to ALL people. It is, as I said, a theory. No more and no less. The fact remains that a mother is the first woman in a boy’s life – and the father is the first man in a girl’s life. Whether and to what extent this shapes and how far and intensive this embossing is – this is the exciting thing.

EarthCitizen20
2 years ago

I assume that these drawers have formed only for the people who could potentially reproduce each other. This was probably not the focus for people of the same biological sex.

cas65
2 years ago

Certainly. I don’t know.

cas65
2 years ago

Only then is it a case that psychiatrists should deal with. All the others don’t mind, I think…

BeviBaby
2 years ago

What does it mean when you hear that daughters are “loved” in their father?

Usually nothing. That there really is an incestuous relationship behind it is extremely rare or is never meant.

What is meant is that the little girl just loves his father very much and daddy idealizes a bit. This is often said in small children under 12 if it is simply the typical ‘daddy’s little girl’ and has an enormously tight bond to the dad.
That doesn’t really have anything to do with sexuality as you would see her or to do ‘romantic’ love. Especially very small children often announce that they want to marry the opposite-sex parent, which is not an expression of any incestuous fantasies, but the child at this moment takes up the concept of marriage and romantic love and transfers it to the person who is exemplary for man/woman. Father or mother.

is that just a swarm or is it more in their dreams?

That’s shimmering. Dreams usually do not exist because we, we say, when something is said, usually do not have the intention to go in the direction of an incestuous relationship.

And how do the fathers see that?

Depends on the individual father. Usually they are happy when their little girl worships them a bit. Isn’t there anything to do with it?

Lexa1
2 years ago
Reply to  BeviBaby

Good answer 👍

Midnight1999
2 years ago

That came from Freud. He called fathers the “first great love” of their daughters. But if I remember correctly, he did not mean the love between two companions of life, but only that the relationship of the daughter to the father has a decisive influence on their attitude to the world of men and their later relationships. And in the other way, keep with sons and their mothers.

Lysandra13
2 years ago

Having not heard this yet and what it is about, always comes to the individual person

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

It is a particularly intimate relationship between father and daughter. There’s also mother and son. No, it’s not about sex or a relationship between different sexes, but only a spiritual connection and soul relationship.

DrSall
2 years ago

Then it should be examined urgently, it could be pado perpetrators

BeviBaby
2 years ago
Reply to  DrSall

Then it should be examined urgently, it could be pado perpetrators

Nonsense…

Lexa1
2 years ago
Reply to  DrSall

No