If there was an aircraft that could fly to Mars and back in 2 hours, would it have only taken 4 hours on Earth?
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Don't turn off airplane mode on the plane?
Hey, What would happen if I didn't turn off airplane mode on my phone during the flight?
15k Tornado Vape in hand luggage to Mallorca at 17?
What do I need to consider?
Which squawk for vandalism/rioters?
It's not uncommon for passengers to start arguments with each other or harass the staff on board an airplane. I'm wondering if there's a specific transponder code for this. Or does the 7700 code apply here?
How do you make sure that you don't get ripped off when eating out as a tourist abroad?
Prices aren't always listed, and you don't always get the card. Then you suddenly have a 200 euro bill.
Can I (25) fly alone with my sister (14)?
My parents allow it and give me travel authorization. Would that be a problem?
No a little more because the faster you continue the slower the time in relation to the unmoving. But in the short flight to Mars, it won’t be much. Even if you’re flying around the world by plane, it makes a few microseconds. With your example, you would have to fly quite different speeds.
Thank you for the award!
It’ll be a few seconds more, but not much more. The speed is hardly relativistic, but quite to a small extent relativistic.
It also depends fundamentally on whether Mars and Earth are as close as possible to each other, or as far away from each other as possible – or anything between them.
On the “short” distance and at the speed the time dilatation has not yet been measurable.
The theory of relativity says that the time is slower the faster you move.
The famous thought game known as twin-sparadoxon.
https://www.swr.de/know/1000-responses/relativitaetstheorie-wuerde-bei-lichtspeed-die-zeit-fuer-mich-stand- bleiben-102.html
https://www.frag-sophie.de/database/post/warum-vergang-zeit-im-weltraum-faster