Welsh a yearling?
Hello everyone, I have a one-year-old Welsh A foal who is already 1.11 meters tall. My question is, I'm 1.65 meters tall and weigh 51 kg.
Since I want to classify my yearling at 4-5 years old, I'm wondering if I'm too big?
The vet said she'll be 1.25m tall, and I'll be honest, I don't want to be a burden to her because of my weight if I'm perhaps too heavy? It's very important to me that my little girl doesn't develop back problems, etc.
What do you say?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
why you buy a welsh a if you are 1,65m tall and don’t want to drive…
Yeah, you’re too big. by lever and pendulum action quadruples the weight which is located outside the center of gravity.
If you don’t want to put back problems on the pony, it must be outrageous. You could get that pony if it’s about 4 1/2.
So no 1,80 men can ride to 1,30 big Isis??????
Or 1.40 big quarterhorses, tinkers, haflingers, whatever?
It’s just that it’s a good thing to get rid of.
Just because it’s done doesn’t mean it’s all right! A 1.80m tall normal sword man IST too big and too heavy for most quarters, Isis, Tinker or Haflinger. And especially on the quarterhorses there are often no normal weighted men, but unfortunately very often even overweighted men and believe me, that does not do the horses well.
And careful riding is a good basis, but nevertheless does not produce steel backs and joints. Too big is too big and too heavy.
In fact, it comes to body construction. A more square horse usually holds more than one in the back too long, but there are also clear limits of loadability.
a welsh a is almost a miniature blossom.
I wouldn’t put myself on a scam…
the races you quote are ALL horses, not ponys. with corresponding horse characteristics.
horses and ponys are something fundamentally different.
you don’t find a saddle that you can sit as an adult on a welsh a that fits the pony.
1,25m stockmass is at a welshpony 1,18-1,20m back height.
the pony on the picture is about 1.25m – you notice how small this is?
I also have a Welsh A and a Shetty Rocksh Mix, both super driving ponies…
who’s been here for longer knows my picture with the really well muscled welsh b.
the weight of the rider is not the problem. the problem is the size of the rider and that thus the greatest part of the rider is not in the center of gravity, but swings about it in a movement axis. the generated lever action. each program is quadrupled out of the focus. That’s the problem.
I’ll give you the right. There are actually a number of great riders that are still covered by their actually too small horses and also ride them astonishingly aesthetically. But these are exceptions.
In recent times, I am unfortunately increasingly observing that even too heavy riders can be found on too small horses, which I find incompatible with the love of the animal.
From this I think it is good that the questioner, then, thinks about the size and weight ratio – because for such a small horse she is plus saddle – even if she is absolutely slim and easy for her size, is still too heavy for my reason.
A mini full blossom is also a horse and not a pony, and that on the picture is barely 1.25 tall when the man sits, it reaches the hip. (kitchen cabinet height… 80 cm…).
The rider has grown and should not be heavier….
but honestly, I don’t understand why an adult is laying a Welsh A, where love falls….
@Sallyvita: unfortunately, you are right that, in Western riding, unfortunately, overweight “the horse falls into the back”…but from the body size it goes, also with physics….
You’re too big, but not too heavy. The TA does not seem to know, Welsh A are usually not over 1.22m tall, mares are usually smaller.
No, please don’t!
That’s a bit about how much she’s muscled. But 51 kg packs them easily
Are you getting bigger? 3, 4 years are long.
If your weight doesn’t change much, it is.
No am 20 years old don’t think I’m still thinking:)
Yeah, well, it’s great!
nix super when you’ve been watching physics.